Solar Calculator: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
=Power Production=
=Power Production=


*https://pvwatts.nrel.gov/pvwatts.php - good. 8.5 MWhr/year with 20 degree tilt or 45 degree tilt. 8.2 MWhr/yr with 12 degree tilt. 8.7 MWhr/yr with 32 degree tilt. 7.8 MWhr/yr with 60 degree tilt. With 2 axis tracking, it is 12 MWhr/yr.
'''This is the key calculator fro NREL'''. Give it location and fixed tilt, and it calculates total power production per year with surprising results: angle matters very little for fixed tilt. Thus, flat rooftop is almost as good as optimal, non-tracked angle. Tracking does give significant improvement, though.
**Good reality check: '''Angle optimization in a fixed system gets you only about 6%! 2 axis tracking gets you 50%.'''
 
*https://pvwatts.nrel.gov/pvwatts.php - good. 8.5 MWhr/year with 20 degree tilt or 45 degree tilt. {{check}}'''8.2 MWhr/yr with 12 degree tilt'''. 8.7 MWhr/yr with 32 degree tilt. 7.8 MWhr/yr with 60 degree tilt. With 2 axis tracking, it is 12 MWhr/yr.
**Good reality check: '''Angle optimization in a fixed system gets you only about 6% improvement! 2 axis tracking gets you 50%.'''


=PV Panel Angle Calculator=
=PV Panel Angle Calculator=
Line 11: Line 13:
*Dual axis trackers improve energy gain by 40% [https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/are-solar-axis-trackers-worth-the-additional-investment]. Is that over fixed mount or seasonal change mount?
*Dual axis trackers improve energy gain by 40% [https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/are-solar-axis-trackers-worth-the-additional-investment]. Is that over fixed mount or seasonal change mount?
*Bifacial panels add 14-40% more energy gain, and tracking adds about 40% [https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1641282]
*Bifacial panels add 14-40% more energy gain, and tracking adds about 40% [https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1641282]
=Solar Elevation Calculator=
*https://keisan.casio.com/exec/system/1224682277

Latest revision as of 19:00, 14 April 2023

Power Production

This is the key calculator fro NREL. Give it location and fixed tilt, and it calculates total power production per year with surprising results: angle matters very little for fixed tilt. Thus, flat rooftop is almost as good as optimal, non-tracked angle. Tracking does give significant improvement, though.

  • https://pvwatts.nrel.gov/pvwatts.php - good. 8.5 MWhr/year with 20 degree tilt or 45 degree tilt. Check.png8.2 MWhr/yr with 12 degree tilt. 8.7 MWhr/yr with 32 degree tilt. 7.8 MWhr/yr with 60 degree tilt. With 2 axis tracking, it is 12 MWhr/yr.
    • Good reality check: Angle optimization in a fixed system gets you only about 6% improvement! 2 axis tracking gets you 50%.

PV Panel Angle Calculator

  • Useful to study latitude (not much difference) vs time of day (lots of differentce, as this difference is determined by air mass. Think of space: in space around the earth, insolation would be constant.

https://www.pveducation.org/pvcdrom/properties-of-sunlight/calculation-of-solar-insolation

  • Dual axis trackers improve energy gain by 40% [1]. Is that over fixed mount or seasonal change mount?
  • Bifacial panels add 14-40% more energy gain, and tracking adds about 40% [2]

Solar Elevation Calculator