Underdeveloped Crops: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Added a Category to the Page)
m (Fixed an internal link)
Line 5: Line 5:
*Via [[Genetic Engineering]] what took decades or GENERATIONS, can be done in years
*Via [[Genetic Engineering]] what took decades or GENERATIONS, can be done in years
*Corn/Maize is a great example of how far something can come (this was done mostly via selective breeding)
*Corn/Maize is a great example of how far something can come (this was done mostly via selective breeding)
*If this level of change was applied to [[Cattails]] ,  [[Pawpaws]] ,  or [[Dandylions]] for food use, there could be many new crops
*If this level of change was applied to [[Cattails]] ,  [[Pawpaws]] ,  or [[Dandelions]] for food use, there could be many new crops
*Most [[Cruciferous vegetables]] came from one "ancestor plant".  Thus developing even one of the MANY potential underdeveloped crops humanity could gain many new food ingredients, that also may grow better in some areas
*Most [[Cruciferous vegetables]] came from one "ancestor plant".  Thus developing even one of the MANY potential underdeveloped crops humanity could gain many new food ingredients, that also may grow better in some areas



Revision as of 17:47, 10 August 2023

Basics

  • Plants / "Proto-Crops" that were never domesticated
  • Often due to the time needed for Selective Breeding being longer than how long it took for another culture to introduce an existing crop
  • Via Genetic Engineering what took decades or GENERATIONS, can be done in years
  • Corn/Maize is a great example of how far something can come (this was done mostly via selective breeding)
  • If this level of change was applied to Cattails , Pawpaws , or Dandelions for food use, there could be many new crops
  • Most Cruciferous vegetables came from one "ancestor plant". Thus developing even one of the MANY potential underdeveloped crops humanity could gain many new food ingredients, that also may grow better in some areas

Internal Links

External Links

  • The Wikipedia Page on Neglected and underutilized crops (Wikipedia chose this name, it seems to have few (~300,000) results in google search, GRANTED the "underdeveloped" may be leading to use cases such as "Underdeveloped nations" and thus lots of irrelevant results inflating results? Either way this page's name is more concise and ties into the "developer" language. Any thoughts on this? (could discuss further in the discussion page, or Slack / Discord )