CPVC vs PVC vs CTS: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
And, LFMC is same size as PVC - [https://www.wireandcableyourway.com/1-2-in-liquid-tight-flexible-metallic-conduit-type-ua-100ft-500ft-or-1000ft].
And, LFMC is same size as PVC - [https://www.wireandcableyourway.com/1-2-in-liquid-tight-flexible-metallic-conduit-type-ua-100ft-500ft-or-1000ft].


And, LFNC is similar size as PVC - 0.81 nominal instead of 0.84 [https://www.menards.com/main/electrical/conduit-conduit-fittings-raceways/conduit/southwire-reg-100-liquidtight-flexible-non-metallic-conduit/58046201/p-1444442916472-c-6423.htm]
And, LFNC is similar size as PVC - 0.81 nominal instead of 0.84 [https://www.menards.com/main/electrical/conduit-conduit-fittings-raceways/conduit/southwire-reg-100-liquidtight-flexible-non-metallic-conduit/58046201/p-1444442916472-c-6423.htm] which is probably the same.

Revision as of 19:20, 17 October 2023

Some CPVC is the same dimensionality as PVC. PVC is not the same size as CTS. But, some CPVC is CTS-CPVC - being copper tube sized.

But note that plastic electrical conduit is the same size as regular pvc - [1].

And, LFMC is same size as PVC - [2].

And, LFNC is similar size as PVC - 0.81 nominal instead of 0.84 [3] which is probably the same.

Retrieved from "https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?title=CPVC_vs_PVC_vs_CTS&oldid=289839"