Giving an A Assessment: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Everyone has the capacity to grow and a rise up to a challenge and the OSE evaluation procwss is based on this premise. Missing skills are perfectly acceptable. What is unacceptable is evidence that the person has limited capacity to learn and grow. It is indeed an onerous burden to expect that someone will have all the necessary skills initially, because the nature of the program is to create these integrated skill sets. We know that education today is so disintegrated that to expect these skill sets to exist is not realistic. Not realistic means one in a million, such as already explored at [[Five Legged Dog]]. | Everyone has the capacity to grow and a rise up to a challenge and the OSE evaluation procwss is based on this premise. Missing skills are perfectly acceptable. What is unacceptable is evidence that the person has limited capacity to learn and grow. It is indeed an onerous burden to expect that someone will have all the necessary skills initially, because the nature of the program is to create these integrated skill sets. We know that education today is so disintegrated that to expect these skill sets to exist is not realistic. Not realistic means one in a million, such as already explored at [[Five Legged Dog]]. | ||
The initial assessment of candidates starts with someone responding to an [[Open Invitation to OSE]]. | The initial assessment of candidates starts with someone responding to an [[Open Invitation to OSE]]. At the early stages, it is important to set expectations, and determine where the individual lies in their understanding of the OSE Culture, and how they are approaching a potential transition to sustainable OSE work. | ||
Key items to gain clarity on are: | |||
#Is this person interested in leaving a legacy, contributing to humanity, and becoming immortal through their contribution? Or is the person just passing through, with no visible effect on the grand order of things, in that whether they were born or not, the world would not see a difference? | |||
#Does the person have the we, inclusive mindset, recognizing that collaboration unlocks immense powers? That means, they can work openly, engage in [[Sharing]], | |||
Revision as of 15:31, 15 December 2023
Everyone has the capacity to grow and a rise up to a challenge and the OSE evaluation procwss is based on this premise. Missing skills are perfectly acceptable. What is unacceptable is evidence that the person has limited capacity to learn and grow. It is indeed an onerous burden to expect that someone will have all the necessary skills initially, because the nature of the program is to create these integrated skill sets. We know that education today is so disintegrated that to expect these skill sets to exist is not realistic. Not realistic means one in a million, such as already explored at Five Legged Dog.
The initial assessment of candidates starts with someone responding to an Open Invitation to OSE. At the early stages, it is important to set expectations, and determine where the individual lies in their understanding of the OSE Culture, and how they are approaching a potential transition to sustainable OSE work.
Key items to gain clarity on are:
- Is this person interested in leaving a legacy, contributing to humanity, and becoming immortal through their contribution? Or is the person just passing through, with no visible effect on the grand order of things, in that whether they were born or not, the world would not see a difference?
- Does the person have the we, inclusive mindset, recognizing that collaboration unlocks immense powers? That means, they can work openly, engage in Sharing,