The Legal Analyst: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
(→Notes) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
=Notes= | =Notes= | ||
*p9 - patents - one claim is that by getting a patent and preventing others from the same - others are incentivized to innovate on other ways. Bullshit argument - because nothing prevents others from innovating if patent does not exist. If patent does not exist, there is more ab-initio thinking, which may be argued to increase innovation. | |||
*[[Inadvertent Cognoscenti]] - people who don't keep things secret, but who don't take the trouble to fill everyone in. [[Effective Trade Secrets]] | *[[Inadvertent Cognoscenti]] - people who don't keep things secret, but who don't take the trouble to fill everyone in. [[Effective Trade Secrets]] | ||
Revision as of 22:41, 7 April 2024
ToC: https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/L/bo5414943.html
First 60 pages:
https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Legal_Analyst/slj9yJt1_JcC?hl=en&gbpv=1&printsec=frontcover
Chapter 14 - http://www.thelegalanalyst.com/Cascades.pdf
Notes
- p9 - patents - one claim is that by getting a patent and preventing others from the same - others are incentivized to innovate on other ways. Bullshit argument - because nothing prevents others from innovating if patent does not exist. If patent does not exist, there is more ab-initio thinking, which may be argued to increase innovation.
- Inadvertent Cognoscenti - people who don't keep things secret, but who don't take the trouble to fill everyone in. Effective Trade Secrets