Latest revision as of 23:32, 7 April 2024

First 60 pages:

Notes

General WTF - if a wrong is committed, the perpetrator pays. Full liability (strict liability) solves it.
Least cost avoider - another flawed doctrine. It makes the person who could solve it cheapest pay. How about considering who is guilty? WTF?
47 Strict liability - doer pays all damage that an act causes. Can we get bastards under strict liability and not under triple tree damages?
37 single owner - doctrine where you penalize when someone does not acta as a single owner would.
Summary - another shitty book on a disintegrated perspective (non-holistic), siloed thinking, denial of universal agency and prosperity.
Minimizing waste or maximizing wealth (concentration) - complete perverse incentives of enforcing artificial scarcity. The legal system enforces this scarcity. Profound change is needed. Faulty mental models and biases need to be eliminated.
Res juricate - the thing is decided - doctrine that prevents second trial that brings up new issues.
p9 - patents - one claim is that by getting a patent and preventing others from the same - others are incentivized to innovate on other ways. Bullshit argument - because nothing prevents others from innovating if patent does not exist. If patent does not exist, there is more ab-initio thinking, which may be argued to increase innovation.
Inadvertent Cognoscenti - people who don't keep things secret, but who don't take the trouble to fill everyone in. Effective Trade Secrets

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 =Notes=
-*37 single owner - doctrine where you think like you owned both sides, what would you do?
+*General WTF - if a wrong is committed, the perpetrator pays. Full liability (strict liability) solves it.
+*Least cost avoider - another flawed doctrine. It makes the person who could solve it cheapest pay. How about considering who is guilty? WTF?
+*47 Strict liability - doer pays all damage that an act causes. Can we get bastards under strict liability and not under triple tree damages?
+*37 single owner - doctrine where you penalize when someone does not acta as a single owner would.
 *Summary - another shitty book on a disintegrated perspective (non-holistic), siloed thinking, denial of universal agency and prosperity.
 *Minimizing waste or maximizing wealth (concentration) - complete perverse incentives of enforcing artificial scarcity. The legal system enforces this scarcity. Profound change is needed. Faulty mental models and biases need to be eliminated.