Counterclaims: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Meta) |
(→Meta) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
=Meta= | =Meta= | ||
*General denial - throw it out of court on frivolous lawsuit allegation. FRCP Rule 8 [https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_8] | *General denial - throw it out of court on frivolous lawsuit allegation. FRCP Rule 8 [https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_8] | ||
*'''Bullshit Responses''' - samples of legal perversion - [https://www.nelsonmullins.com/storage/c6f61b6e91046b387d6e28404fc96e54.pdf] | |||
Revision as of 19:51, 20 July 2024
Type of language involved:
- legal conclusion required therefore decline to answer
- insufficient information in claim, thus deny
- admit
- deny
- neither admit or deny
- admit/deny in part - specify which parts
- 'no response required' - because it's obvious - doesn't this violate rules of responding?
- 'Defendants are without sufficient information to either admit or deny the
allegations contained in paragraph x, and therefore deny the same.'