Critique of Open Source: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "*proliferation of potentially dangerous capacity [https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/GBAzW4pZ5JgJqGMJg/against-the-open-source-closed-source-dichotomy-regulated] **OSE...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
*proliferation of potentially dangerous capacity [https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/GBAzW4pZ5JgJqGMJg/against-the-open-source-closed-source-dichotomy-regulated] | *proliferation of potentially dangerous capacity [https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/GBAzW4pZ5JgJqGMJg/against-the-open-source-closed-source-dichotomy-regulated] | ||
**OSE perspective - this danger fails to address the [[ | **OSE perspective - this danger fails to address the [[Compiler Problem]] | ||
**This is good in terms of open standards bodies | **This is good in terms of open standards bodies | ||
**This may not be good in how the open standards body is created, its overhead, etc. it must be fully open access, not a proprietary consortiumm. | **This may not be good in how the open standards body is created, its overhead, etc. it must be fully open access, not a proprietary consortiumm. | ||
Revision as of 22:15, 27 October 2024
- proliferation of potentially dangerous capacity [1]
- OSE perspective - this danger fails to address the Compiler Problem
- This is good in terms of open standards bodies
- This may not be good in how the open standards body is created, its overhead, etc. it must be fully open access, not a proprietary consortiumm.