Open Source Rockets: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with " =Software= *OpenRocket Simulator - [https://openrocket.info/]") |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
=Software= | =Software= | ||
*OpenRocket Simulator - [https://openrocket.info/] | *OpenRocket Simulator - [https://openrocket.info/] | ||
*How to simulate - [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sEzRzkGRpDQ]. This is pretty advanced for a beginner. Uses OpenRocket + Matlab. Scilab Xcos is open source version of Simulink of Matlab, and Octave is an open source version of Matlab. | |||
**Including hardware in loop - uses the actual flight controller, but injects simulated inputs. All done via code on the ground. | |||
**Study this Nick of Lafayette Systems for the details of rocket control. | |||
**Other videos even have examples of self-landing rockets. | |||
**Case is there for designing controllers in a construction set type of way - can we generalize microcontroller to addon of various other components? Can we standardize numerous components for higher interoperability? That would be a good start. | |||
Latest revision as of 07:36, 10 March 2025
Software
- OpenRocket Simulator - [1]
- How to simulate - [2]. This is pretty advanced for a beginner. Uses OpenRocket + Matlab. Scilab Xcos is open source version of Simulink of Matlab, and Octave is an open source version of Matlab.
- Including hardware in loop - uses the actual flight controller, but injects simulated inputs. All done via code on the ground.
- Study this Nick of Lafayette Systems for the details of rocket control.
- Other videos even have examples of self-landing rockets.
- Case is there for designing controllers in a construction set type of way - can we generalize microcontroller to addon of various other components? Can we standardize numerous components for higher interoperability? That would be a good start.