Systems Design of Metacrisis: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
These are some systems design features of a world that suffers from the metacrisis. | These are some systems design features of a world that suffers from the metacrisis. | ||
*Learning is retarded. You do not learn real working product design (design is proprietary) and much of prior art is trade secret. Thus [[Integrated Design]] is impossible, and complex systems problem solving is a priori impossible at low cost if using proprietary products and designs. Caveat: you can learn very specific skills, but not [[Integrated Design]] | *Learning is retarded. You do not learn real working product design (design is proprietary) and much of prior art is trade secret. Thus [[Integrated Design]] is impossible, and complex systems problem solving is a priori impossible at low cost if using proprietary products and designs. Caveat: you can learn very specific skills, but not [[Integrated Design]]. You cannot learn systems design, becausebsystem values are confused or not transparent. | ||
*[[Aggregate Efficiency]] is a permanent low (14%?) due to [[Competitive Waste]] | |||
=Links= | =Links= | ||
*[[Architectures 101]] | *[[Architectures 101]] | ||
Latest revision as of 00:35, 24 March 2025
These are some systems design features of a world that suffers from the metacrisis.
- Learning is retarded. You do not learn real working product design (design is proprietary) and much of prior art is trade secret. Thus Integrated Design is impossible, and complex systems problem solving is a priori impossible at low cost if using proprietary products and designs. Caveat: you can learn very specific skills, but not Integrated Design. You cannot learn systems design, becausebsystem values are confused or not transparent.
- Aggregate Efficiency is a permanent low (14%?) due to Competitive Waste