Feynman Technique and Evaluating Information: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
#Ask a hard honest question, like a naive child's question, and see if a person gets stumped. And if they admit to being stuck, they can extricate themselves from being a bullshitter by how they handle the situation. If they display humility, then their integrity belongs to the class of wisdom. | #Ask a hard honest question, like a naive child's question, and see if a person gets stumped. And if they admit to being stuck, they can extricate themselves from being a bullshitter by how they handle the situation. If they display humility, then their integrity belongs to the class of wisdom. | ||
#Use [[Grey Thinking]], or think in probabilities, not certainties | #Use [[Grey Thinking]], or think in probabilities, not certainties | ||
#Ask “Is this actually the case?” and not “Could this actually be the case?” | |||
[[Category: Mental Models]] | [[Category: Mental Models]] | ||
Revision as of 01:23, 15 April 2025
https://fs.blog/feynman-learning-technique/
Evaluating Expertise
https://fs.blog/evaluating-information/
Learnings:
To discern a bullshitter (someone who appears to know a lot) from one who actually knows a lot, you can:
- Ask a hard honest question, like a naive child's question, and see if a person gets stumped. And if they admit to being stuck, they can extricate themselves from being a bullshitter by how they handle the situation. If they display humility, then their integrity belongs to the class of wisdom.
- Use Grey Thinking, or think in probabilities, not certainties
- Ask “Is this actually the case?” and not “Could this actually be the case?”