Arbitration: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(10 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
*Parameters of arbitration - 1 or 3 typical arbitrators. 1 likely here since this is not complex. | *Parameters of arbitration - 1 or 3 typical arbitrators. 1 likely here since this is not complex. | ||
*Modified, very relaxed legal proceeding. Not looking strictly at rules of procedure or evidence | *Modified, very relaxed legal proceeding. Not looking strictly at rules of procedure or evidence | ||
*Typically - decision on the spot. Once ruled - that's it | |||
*If he goes nuts - does rulings outside of scope or law - that can be appealed. Can't go back and say arbit was wrong, or ignored facts, or applied wrong law. Stuck with it, that's it. | |||
*2 ways to do it: very informally - we all agree to an arbitrator, who sets the rules. | |||
*Or more common: some arbitral org - American Arbitration Association, is biggest one. | |||
*Approach an org - org comes with a set of rules. We get to pick the org. | |||
*We can suggest characteristics of arbit - such as knowledge in property law. | |||
*Try to include: for international- venue and language used. For here it's a small room rented. Conference room. | |||
*Pay arbitrator hourly rate. | |||
*If use org, also pay an admin fee for case manager. Few thousand for whole deal. | |||
*We can agree that winner pays loser's atty fees. | |||
*Biggest thing to think about - the issue of witnesses. | |||
*Would need to look at MO law regarding witnesses. Can we subpoena them? | |||
*Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) allows arbitrators to issue subpoenas, and they can be enforced by a federal court. Arbitrator, however, has no enforcement of subpoenas. Would need to get court to enforce it. | |||
*Evidence is presented through witnesses in arbitration. | |||
*Court will have stricter conditions. |
Latest revision as of 19:17, 16 May 2025
- Requires absolute agreement between parties
- Parameters of arbitration - 1 or 3 typical arbitrators. 1 likely here since this is not complex.
- Modified, very relaxed legal proceeding. Not looking strictly at rules of procedure or evidence
- Typically - decision on the spot. Once ruled - that's it
- If he goes nuts - does rulings outside of scope or law - that can be appealed. Can't go back and say arbit was wrong, or ignored facts, or applied wrong law. Stuck with it, that's it.
- 2 ways to do it: very informally - we all agree to an arbitrator, who sets the rules.
- Or more common: some arbitral org - American Arbitration Association, is biggest one.
- Approach an org - org comes with a set of rules. We get to pick the org.
- We can suggest characteristics of arbit - such as knowledge in property law.
- Try to include: for international- venue and language used. For here it's a small room rented. Conference room.
- Pay arbitrator hourly rate.
- If use org, also pay an admin fee for case manager. Few thousand for whole deal.
- We can agree that winner pays loser's atty fees.
- Biggest thing to think about - the issue of witnesses.
- Would need to look at MO law regarding witnesses. Can we subpoena them?
- Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) allows arbitrators to issue subpoenas, and they can be enforced by a federal court. Arbitrator, however, has no enforcement of subpoenas. Would need to get court to enforce it.
- Evidence is presented through witnesses in arbitration.
- Court will have stricter conditions.