Open Source Skid Steer: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "=Working Doc= *Working doc mention - [https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1UWzIanNFRqPP5td7yyYe-ZYHQwtEC-d2u8VBY6wPIfs/edit?slide=id.g36e40919669_0_0#slide=id.g36e40919669_0_0] =Specification= From Avinash Baskaran, Ph.D., OSHWA Postdoctoral Fellow Based on our initial conversation, I identified broad steps for a full-stack, open-source grading autonomy system. The stack is scoped within ROS and “SLAM” framework (Simultaneous Localization And Mapping, whi...") |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 22:41, 4 August 2025
Working Doc
- Working doc mention - [1]
Specification
From Avinash Baskaran, Ph.D., OSHWA Postdoctoral Fellow
Based on our initial conversation, I identified broad steps for a full-stack, open-source grading autonomy system. The stack is scoped within ROS and “SLAM” framework (Simultaneous Localization And Mapping, which was a major focus of my PhD):
- Drone-based multiview reconstruction using ROS + openMVG/MVS for topographical mapping
- Open hardware rotary laser level + machine-mounted receiver for fine grading
- Real-time toolpath planning using RViz + Open3D + RTAB-Map
I plan to use the BeagleBone AI-64, an open-source platform to control the skid-steer, is this acceptable? Step 1 above is optional when elevation changes are minor compared to the receiver height, but I think it’s a valuable addition for enabling full autonomy. I’ve also received a high-fidelity SparkFun RTK GPS module from Nathan Seidle, which I’ll use to validate and calibrate the localization. Overall this approach balances cost, industry-aligned best practices, and high RoI. It also generalizes to applications at PARC, like autonomous crop and livestock management and hydrology.
Looking forward to sharing and discussing initial results soon.