Universal Stabilized Subgrade Foundation: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
#There’s no economic incentive for that industry to disrupt itself. | #There’s no economic incentive for that industry to disrupt itself. | ||
#Few designers are trained in subgrade engineering or geosynthetics. | #Few designers are trained in subgrade engineering or geosynthetics. | ||
#Moisture and thermal detailing are unfamiliar to conventional builders. | |||
Wow. | |||
We have discussed 70% electrical power use reduction of humanity using the [[Thermal Battery]]. | We have discussed 70% electrical power use reduction of humanity using the [[Thermal Battery]]. | ||
Revision as of 13:24, 9 November 2025
Would make a good tiktok video to dispel myths.
Universal stabilized subgrade outperforms concrete for single story homes. Period. Just look at the details and you'll be blown away: [1].
Reason not used everywhere? System integration literacy:
- bureaucratic inertia, not physics, keeps slabs dominant.
- Perception lags far behind geotechnical reality.
- There’s no economic incentive for that industry to disrupt itself.
- Few designers are trained in subgrade engineering or geosynthetics.
- Moisture and thermal detailing are unfamiliar to conventional builders.
Wow.
We have discussed 70% electrical power use reduction of humanity using the Thermal Battery.
Now we can save about 95+% [2] of all residential concrete use by the Universal Stabilized Subgrade (USS) - for a tatal reduction of 3% of all carbon emissions by stepping away from concrete into the universal stabilized subgrade. Cement is 8% of all global carbon emissions. This puts it into the Category:TikTok of viral videos.
And on top of that - 100% disruption of carbon-emitting concrete production with Solar Concrete - This puts it into another Category:TikTok of viral videos.