Hand Warmers: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Added some more information)
 
(Saved Progress Mid-Long Edit)
Line 21: Line 21:
*Main downside is short runtime
*Main downside is short runtime
*For better or for worse they are recharged via Boiling
*For better or for worse they are recharged via Boiling
**If you currently have Electricity etc this is a bit of a pain vs Battery Rechargeable Units
**If Camping or currently Without Electricity, it is neat as even a Pot over a Campfire could work as long as you have water
==Fueled Versions==
*Disadvantage over Rechargeable is that you have a Fuel Cost to consider, not just the (comparatively low) Cost of Electricity etc
*Also in Combustible Atmospheres / Some Locations they probably aren’t allowed either
**Although if [[Intrinsically Safe Battery Electric Hand Warmers]] exist is the REAL question
*Can have long(er) runtime, no issues with Cold Weather Operation, etc
===Solid Fuel===
*Insulated Box you put smoldering charcoal “sticks” in
===Liquid Fuel===
*[[Zippo]] Style [[Catalytic Hand Warmers]]
*Run on [[Lighter Fluid]] tests on other materials would be neat

Revision as of 12:30, 12 November 2025

Basics

  • This page aims to go over the various forms of Hand Warmers, Existing Off The Shelf Options, and potential for OSE Improvements/Development

Disposable

  • These are a bit wasteful
  • Essentially Iron Powder and Charcoal/Some other materials to Moderate the Redox Reaction (Slow Hot Rust, rather than a Metal Fire etc)
  • POTENTIALLY could be collected+reprocessed
  • Also potentially could be made from or reprocessed with DRI as that process yields itself well to Powderization
  • Alternative Chemistries would be interesting to pursue, but Disposable Devices (Short of Emergency/Expeditionary Use) don’t really fit OSE Specifications

Reusable

Rechargeable

Electric

  • Essentially just a battery, resistive heating element, and control circuitry cleverly packaged together
  • Main concern is Battery Life (long term, Charge/Discharge Cycles, ESPECIALLY thermal management)
  • They do have the advantage of being easily recharged, and typically having long run times (10+ Hours)

Phase Change Materials

  • Pretty Neat
  • Also if clear they have a neat visual of the Supercooled solution recrystallizing
  • Main downside is short runtime
  • For better or for worse they are recharged via Boiling
    • If you currently have Electricity etc this is a bit of a pain vs Battery Rechargeable Units
    • If Camping or currently Without Electricity, it is neat as even a Pot over a Campfire could work as long as you have water

Fueled Versions

  • Disadvantage over Rechargeable is that you have a Fuel Cost to consider, not just the (comparatively low) Cost of Electricity etc
  • Also in Combustible Atmospheres / Some Locations they probably aren’t allowed either
  • Can have long(er) runtime, no issues with Cold Weather Operation, etc

Solid Fuel

  • Insulated Box you put smoldering charcoal “sticks” in

Liquid Fuel