Elastomeric Coating: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created Page + Added Basic Sections/Info) |
(Saved Progress Mid-Long Edit) |
||
| Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
=Concerns= | =Concerns= | ||
==Product Lifespan Concerns== | |||
*[[Rubber Reversion]] occurs on many older tools and such | |||
*Since it is typically a coating/overmold, removal of the decayed coating is difficult/impossible | |||
**Also in the process generating [[M/NP Pollution]] which isn’t great | |||
***Flaking [[Pleather]] on a Seat or Headphone Ear Cup is a decent analogy, although rubber reversion tends to be “goopier” / sticky at that point | |||
===Potential Solutions=== | |||
====Routine Removal+Reapplication==== | |||
*This would most likely need to be done as a service at a makerspace etc, BUT | |||
**Pry Off/Rotary Tool Drill Out/[[Media Blasting]] wear away/[[Laser Ablation|Ablate away]] the coating/overmolding | |||
**Depending on design and state of decay may be quite labor intensive | |||
**Also would generate a ton of [[MNPs]] which would need to be captured+disposed of properly | |||
====Alternative Fulfillment of the Same Goal==== | |||
*A [[Silicon Case]] / [[Elastomer Case]] (if designed properly) could fulfill much of the same functionality/goals (Non-Slip/Skid, “Grippiness”, Shock Protection (from dropping/crashing etc), etc) | |||
*It would be removable, and depending on [[Product Life Cycle]] / [[Spare Parts Availability]] (re: [[Phone Cases]] ; rarely any good/major brand cases for OLD phones etc), [[User Replaceable]] | |||
*Main potential issues would be: | |||
**Difficulty in getting the case on | |||
***As was the case with “Wiimotes” and their Elastomer Cases, especially those with the “Wii Motion Plus” brick | |||
**Poor Bond/“Cling” of the case | |||
***Given that they are not chemically/mechanically bonded, ESPECIALLY if poorly designed/made, they may slide around/have a gap of air that debris could get into etc | |||
***This could POTENTIALLY be solved via some sort of [[Adhesive]] | |||
***Also via [[Magnets]], although these would add some issues | |||
****[[Threaded Inserts]] may work well in a similar manner while being easily reversable (just remove the sc | |||
* | * | ||
=Internal Links= | =Internal Links= | ||
* | * | ||
Latest revision as of 15:14, 5 December 2025
Basics
- A term for the Coating of a Product (or Structure/Vehicle, although that may be better addressed on another page) in an Elastomer
- In Product Design/Advertising, it is often Called:
- ”Rubber Armor”
- Although this can be a BIT misleading as Latex is rarely used
- ”Non-Slip Coating”
- The “grippy-ness” of the Elastomer can help prevent dropping something etc
- Also can help with the Ergonomics / Accessibility of things, OXO Good Grips is an example of this
- The Oily/Wet Non-Dominant Hand Test is an interesting test that simulates dexterity issues quite well for otherwise able bodied people
- Link to the product reviewer’s videos here
- ”Rubber Armor”
Options
Overmolding
- This is the highest quality (industrial) method
- A specialized Injection Molding machine is used such that one “shot” is done shortly after, and directly OVER the previous “shot”
- Often done for the handles of Power Tools etc
- For instance a “core” of Glass Filled Nylon surrounded by a TPU of some sort
- Features/Finishes can be designed into the elastomeric surface via Injection Molding Design
Dip Molding
- This produces a smooth coating, and can be done with many products (even aftermarket)
- Main issue is it requires some surface prep, is more limited in how it cam be used, and can ONLY be used for a smooth surface
Spray Coating
- Essentially uses an Elastomeric Paint (Akin to that used along with Crumb Rubber in Playground Surfacing (The material used in Playgrounds / Splash Pads etc
- Can form a thin layer + get into “nooks”
- May also be able to be foamed if a Blowing Agent is included
- Depending on coating quality/number of coats etc may present more of a flaking risk than dip coating
- Especially so if Foamed
- This also ties into MNP Pollution concerns
Multi-Material Printing
FDM
- A Toolchanger 3D Printer or Hotend Changer 3D Printer can print not only different colors, but also different materials
- For instance PLA and TPU
- Joinery -like features can also be used to interlock the materials
MJF
- Different “inks” could be used
- Similar joinery like structures could be used also
SLS or SLA etc
- These processes do not lend themselves to Elastomer use, short of as a separate part
- SPD could potentially do so if the powders flow well enough to the toolhead+melt/consolidate sufficiently
Concerns
Product Lifespan Concerns
- Rubber Reversion occurs on many older tools and such
- Since it is typically a coating/overmold, removal of the decayed coating is difficult/impossible
- Also in the process generating M/NP Pollution which isn’t great
- Flaking Pleather on a Seat or Headphone Ear Cup is a decent analogy, although rubber reversion tends to be “goopier” / sticky at that point
- Also in the process generating M/NP Pollution which isn’t great
Potential Solutions
Routine Removal+Reapplication
- This would most likely need to be done as a service at a makerspace etc, BUT
- Pry Off/Rotary Tool Drill Out/Media Blasting wear away/Ablate away the coating/overmolding
- Depending on design and state of decay may be quite labor intensive
- Also would generate a ton of MNPs which would need to be captured+disposed of properly
Alternative Fulfillment of the Same Goal
- A Silicon Case / Elastomer Case (if designed properly) could fulfill much of the same functionality/goals (Non-Slip/Skid, “Grippiness”, Shock Protection (from dropping/crashing etc), etc)
- It would be removable, and depending on Product Life Cycle / Spare Parts Availability (re: Phone Cases ; rarely any good/major brand cases for OLD phones etc), User Replaceable
- Main potential issues would be:
- Difficulty in getting the case on
- As was the case with “Wiimotes” and their Elastomer Cases, especially those with the “Wii Motion Plus” brick
- Poor Bond/“Cling” of the case
- Given that they are not chemically/mechanically bonded, ESPECIALLY if poorly designed/made, they may slide around/have a gap of air that debris could get into etc
- This could POTENTIALLY be solved via some sort of Adhesive
- Also via Magnets, although these would add some issues
- Threaded Inserts may work well in a similar manner while being easily reversable (just remove the sc
- Difficulty in getting the case on