Dry vs “Wet” Compressed Air: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Added some more information)
(Added some more information)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 18: Line 18:
**[[Air Systems International]] ‘s “Breather Box™️” is the COTS industry standard of sorts, although they aren’t TOO DIFFICULT to DIY
**[[Air Systems International]] ‘s “Breather Box™️” is the COTS industry standard of sorts, although they aren’t TOO DIFFICULT to DIY
***Short of [[Liability]]/[[Traceability]] etc, especially for [[IDLH]] use
***Short of [[Liability]]/[[Traceability]] etc, especially for [[IDLH]] use
==Water Vapor==
*Drying can be done BEFORE compression, or after
*As of this edit, this page will largely focus on Post-Compression Water Vapor Removal (although feel free to add more info!)
===Post-Compression Water Vapor Removal===
*Several systems are possible, but mainly:
**[[Silica Gel]] (or other [[Desiccant]] ) Canisters
***Either a sensor, or [[Moisture Indicating Silica Gel]] are useful for this system to be able to determine when the media is Saturated and needs dried out
**Condensation Based Systems
***Depending on desired dryness, and local conditions, a system more akin to a [[Condensing Furnace]] may suffice
***Other systems may require submersion in cooling water (or some other [[Heat Transfer Fluid]] ) or use of a [[Vapor Compression Refrigeration]] system
**Hybrid systems can also be used, where a primitive condenser is used to “take some of the load off” of the desiccant
==Being able to use “standard” air==
*Due to the complexity/bulk, as well as COST of the systems, especially for (High Level) Drying, selecting and designing systems+procedures such that they can tolerate usage of unprocessed “straight out of the compressor” air is beneficial
*Furthermore from a [[Design for Component Failure]] / [[Anti-Fragility]] perspective, there may even be some advantage to having ALL compressed air lines be plumed in a way that can handle operation in a “wet” mode
===Compressed Air Plumbing (Wet vs Dry) ===
*A well designed compressed air tank will have a a [[Design for Cleaning]] -esque [[Cone Bottom Tank]] and a fitting allowing some means of drainage
**A 90 Degree Fitting and a simple [[Ball Valve]] can suffice
***This is a very loud process, and also typically sends a stream of (Potentially Rusty) [[PCW]] spewing (especially if it hasn’t been drained in a while) so AT MINIMUM having to face away from the operator, and having them wear safety glasses+hearing protection CAN WORK
****It should also be in an area where the PCW can be allowed to evaporate off (such as a concrete pad/inside etc, Rags/Oil Adsorbent Pads can also be used)
****Ideally though, some sort of [[Compressed Air Tank Vent Muffler]] would be used, and the PCW would be separated + sealed
**[[Automatic Compressed Air Tank Drains]] CAN be used
***Main issues are:
****Unless they have a pre-vent alarm/notification etc, it can catch people off guard (Although proper [[HAZCOM]] / a mention in the [[Sight Specific Safety Orientation]] (for all (new) workers, and any [[contractors]] ) could alleviate this, along with the aforementioned Muffler
****A more subtle one is the role Routine Manual Draining has in terms of incidentally adding a [[Visual Inspection]] / “Look, Smell, Listen” check to things.  Automated systems are convenient yes, but also can allow for forgetting of systems that would be better observed/maintained
*****Simply opening a ball valve (especially if it is designed in an [[Accesible]] Manner, ie Large Handle Ball Valve, not too close to the floor/covered in dirt etc) isn’t TOO HARD of a task too, so the need for automation isn’t that great (unless the site would be without people for long stretches of time)
*”Wet” Compressed Air Lines:
**Shall be sloped such that Condensate flows downhill to a central drain location, or at least flows under a [[Blowdown]] procedure sufficiently
**They also shall be designed to resist any sort of corrosion/clogging/[[Vapor Lock]] that can occur
*”Dry” Compressed Air Lines may have the advantage of simpler plumbing due to the pressurized gas not needing any sort of slope/special considerations
**Although as per earlier, from a [[Design for Component Failure]] / [[Anti-Fragility]] perspective, doing so anyways may be worthwhile
***If not however though, this may justify the cost for cleaning/drying systems and plays a role in that planning process/math


=Internal Links=
=Internal Links=
*
*[[Compressed Air]]
**[[Compressed Air Storage]]
**[[Compressed Air Plumbing]]
**[[Compressed Air Hose]]
***[[Compressed Air Hose Reel]]
**[[Compressed Air Fittings]]
*[[Dry Nitrogen]]
**[[Dry Nitrogen vs Dry Compressed Air]]
**[[Open Source Pressurized Dry Storage Box]]


=External Links=
=External Links=
*
*

Latest revision as of 14:57, 16 December 2025

Basics

Considerations

Preface

  • As stated previously, this page aims to largely cover Oil Sealed/Lubricated Piston Based Compressors
  • As the air exits most of these it contains Oil Mist and Water Vapor
  • The Oil Mist isn’t the WORST for most things, but can be problematic for some uses, in particular Supplied Air Respirators etc
  • The Water Vapor can introduce some issues in terms of Long Term Storage use, or especially later when it cools and forms condensate (which can lead to Vapor Lock / Steam Hammer type issues and other issues of a system intended to be Single Phase Flow becoming Two Phase Flow )

Oil Mist

Water Vapor

  • Drying can be done BEFORE compression, or after
  • As of this edit, this page will largely focus on Post-Compression Water Vapor Removal (although feel free to add more info!)

Post-Compression Water Vapor Removal

  • Several systems are possible, but mainly:
    • Silica Gel (or other Desiccant ) Canisters
    • Condensation Based Systems
    • Hybrid systems can also be used, where a primitive condenser is used to “take some of the load off” of the desiccant

Being able to use “standard” air

  • Due to the complexity/bulk, as well as COST of the systems, especially for (High Level) Drying, selecting and designing systems+procedures such that they can tolerate usage of unprocessed “straight out of the compressor” air is beneficial
  • Furthermore from a Design for Component Failure / Anti-Fragility perspective, there may even be some advantage to having ALL compressed air lines be plumed in a way that can handle operation in a “wet” mode

Compressed Air Plumbing (Wet vs Dry)

  • A well designed compressed air tank will have a a Design for Cleaning -esque Cone Bottom Tank and a fitting allowing some means of drainage
    • A 90 Degree Fitting and a simple Ball Valve can suffice
      • This is a very loud process, and also typically sends a stream of (Potentially Rusty) PCW spewing (especially if it hasn’t been drained in a while) so AT MINIMUM having to face away from the operator, and having them wear safety glasses+hearing protection CAN WORK
        • It should also be in an area where the PCW can be allowed to evaporate off (such as a concrete pad/inside etc, Rags/Oil Adsorbent Pads can also be used)
        • Ideally though, some sort of Compressed Air Tank Vent Muffler would be used, and the PCW would be separated + sealed
    • Automatic Compressed Air Tank Drains CAN be used
      • Main issues are:
        • Unless they have a pre-vent alarm/notification etc, it can catch people off guard (Although proper HAZCOM / a mention in the Sight Specific Safety Orientation (for all (new) workers, and any contractors ) could alleviate this, along with the aforementioned Muffler
        • A more subtle one is the role Routine Manual Draining has in terms of incidentally adding a Visual Inspection / “Look, Smell, Listen” check to things. Automated systems are convenient yes, but also can allow for forgetting of systems that would be better observed/maintained
          • Simply opening a ball valve (especially if it is designed in an Accesible Manner, ie Large Handle Ball Valve, not too close to the floor/covered in dirt etc) isn’t TOO HARD of a task too, so the need for automation isn’t that great (unless the site would be without people for long stretches of time)
  • ”Wet” Compressed Air Lines:
    • Shall be sloped such that Condensate flows downhill to a central drain location, or at least flows under a Blowdown procedure sufficiently
    • They also shall be designed to resist any sort of corrosion/clogging/Vapor Lock that can occur
  • ”Dry” Compressed Air Lines may have the advantage of simpler plumbing due to the pressurized gas not needing any sort of slope/special considerations
    • Although as per earlier, from a Design for Component Failure / Anti-Fragility perspective, doing so anyways may be worthwhile
      • If not however though, this may justify the cost for cleaning/drying systems and plays a role in that planning process/math

Internal Links

External Links