Dry Nitrogen vs Dry Compressed Air: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Added some more information)
(Added some more information)
Line 13: Line 13:
***Less change in [[Tire Pressure]] under different thermal conditions
***Less change in [[Tire Pressure]] under different thermal conditions
***Easier Modeling for [[Model Driven Design]] (especially in the context of Motorsports)
***Easier Modeling for [[Model Driven Design]] (especially in the context of Motorsports)
***Cost efficiency/ease of access of (Mostly) Pure Nitrogen in [[Gas Canisters]]
****They pointed out that compared to [[Oxygen]] or [[Argon]] / [[Xenon]] etc, it is a bit less valuable of a product
****Also the obvious cost, especially for VERY dry, in Drying [[Compressed Air]]

Revision as of 15:08, 16 December 2025

Basics

  • This page aims to lay out the current state of the knowledge base on the performance of Dry Nitrogen vs Dry Compressed Air (NOT wet/oil mist filled [[Compressed Air, re: Dry vs “Wet” Compressed Air ) and if need be, plan/conduct further research on this
  • ”Dry Nitrogen Fill” is a bit of a gimmick, but there may be some truth to it is the main “gist” of this page

Internal Links

External Links