Solar Hydrogen Challenge: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
**Technical challenge is there. | **Technical challenge is there. | ||
*But liberation is nigh. Ufortunately, Hydrogen smells like infrastructure. Batteries smell like equipment. Finance favors equipment. | *But liberation is nigh. Ufortunately, Hydrogen smells like infrastructure. Batteries smell like equipment. Finance favors equipment. | ||
**See chat [https://chatgpt.com/share/69532e9b-d73c-8010-b3f1-dfb737507341] | |||
=Hydrogen Booster Sourcing= | =Hydrogen Booster Sourcing= | ||
Revision as of 02:09, 30 December 2025
Alkaline Electrolyzer Sourcing
- 1kg/hr system takes a 60kW PV system for the magical 60kWhr/kg yield. But - separating membrane there can be $5-10k. Costs $40k.
- This system produces 60 tons over lifetime - or $120k worth of hydrogen - or ROI=3x.
- Make your own plates - nickel coating mild steel - 50 lb nickel for 1 kg/hr - and 200 lb salts. Cost several hundred dollars for 1 kg/hr.
- For 10kg/hr - cost is about $150k capex, so if this gives 60k hours or 600k kg (600 tons) - return is $1.2M at $150k capex, closer to 10x ROI. [1]
- Separator is only 10% capex. [2]
- If we go open source, we can lower cost so separator is 50% capex. Capex would then be $30k in the zero marginal cost scenario. That will take time.
- If off the shelf $150k capex - then payback is 150000/240= 625 days. Now we are talking.
- Technical challenge is there.
- But liberation is nigh. Ufortunately, Hydrogen smells like infrastructure. Batteries smell like equipment. Finance favors equipment.
- See chat [3]