Solar Hydrogen Challenge: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=The Promise= | |||
= Why Isn’t Hydrogen Already the Promised Land If the Zero Marginal Cost Economy Is Coming? = | |||
You’re asking the right question: | |||
If energy is tending toward abundance, why isn’t hydrogen already the obvious endpoint? | |||
Why hasn’t the world skipped batteries and moved straight to hydrogen? | |||
The short answer: | |||
'''Hydrogen is not limited by physics or reliability. | |||
It is limited by economics, infrastructure maturity, and institutional inertia.''' | |||
Hydrogen works. | |||
But today’s world is still optimized for scarcity, not abundance. | |||
--- | |||
== Hydrogen Isn’t Dominant Yet Because: == | |||
=== 1. Round-Trip Efficiency Still Matters Today === | |||
Converting electricity → hydrogen → electricity: | |||
* Electrolysis efficiency ≈ 65–75% | |||
* Compression & storage losses | |||
* Fuel cell / combustion ≈ 40–60% | |||
'''Total round-trip efficiency ≈ 30–40%''' | |||
Batteries: | |||
* Charge/discharge + electronics ≈ 85–95% | |||
While electricity is still expensive and grids aren't massively overbuilt, efficiency matters. | |||
So today: | |||
* '''Batteries win for short-cycle, daily balancing''' | |||
* Hydrogen wins at long-duration and industrial scale, but we are not optimizing for those yet | |||
--- | |||
=== 2. Hydrogen Economics Depend on Ultra-Cheap Power === | |||
Hydrogen becomes transformative when: | |||
* Renewable energy is massively overbuilt (2–5×) | |||
* Curtailment is normal | |||
* Electricity frequently hits near-zero marginal cost | |||
Most of the world is not there yet. | |||
Solar is cheap, but not yet abundant enough everywhere that wasting energy is acceptable. | |||
Hydrogen dominates when electricity is so cheap that inefficiency no longer matters. | |||
--- | |||
=== 3. Hydrogen Is Harder to Deploy Than Batteries === | |||
Batteries are “plug-in cabinets.” | |||
Hydrogen is an industrial system: | |||
* Compression | |||
* Storage vessels | |||
* Safety requirements | |||
* Piping and permitting | |||
* Trained operators | |||
* Hazard zoning | |||
Finance people prefer: | |||
* Smaller | |||
* Faster | |||
* Familiar | |||
* Less regulated | |||
Batteries look like “equipment.” | |||
Hydrogen looks like “infrastructure.” | |||
Finance favors equipment. | |||
--- | |||
=== 4. Batteries and Hydrogen Solve Different Problems === | |||
They are not competitors. They serve different time horizons. | |||
* Seconds → batteries | |||
* Hours → batteries | |||
* Day-to-day → mostly batteries | |||
* Multi-day to seasonal storage → hydrogen | |||
* Industrial feedstock → only hydrogen | |||
* Shipping & aviation fuels → hydrogen and hydrogen derivatives | |||
Most grid planners today finance short-term balancing, not seasonal resilience, so batteries dominate deployment. | |||
--- | |||
=== 5. Hydrogen Infrastructure Doesn’t Exist Yet === | |||
Batteries plug into the grid we already have. | |||
Hydrogen requires: | |||
* Compressor supply chains | |||
* Refueling / distribution networks | |||
* Hydrogen safety culture | |||
* Standardized permitting pathways | |||
* Hydrogen turbines, engines, fuel cells in mass deployment | |||
* Workforce training | |||
None of this is physics. | |||
It is '''institutional re-wiring'''. | |||
That takes time. | |||
--- | |||
=== 6. Narrative & Politics === | |||
Hydrogen has: | |||
* Historical hype cycles | |||
* “Hindenburg mythology” | |||
* Association with fossil greenwashing | |||
* Critics focused on inefficiency | |||
Meanwhile: | |||
* Batteries feel familiar | |||
* Cultural trust is higher | |||
* The “story” is simpler | |||
Hydrogen has to fight perception as much as engineering. | |||
--- | |||
== So What’s Actually True? == | |||
=== Hydrogen IS technically sound === | |||
It is: | |||
* Mature | |||
* Reliable | |||
* Safe when engineered correctly | |||
* Industrially proven | |||
* Essential in multiple sectors | |||
Hydrogen’s correct role is: | |||
'''The long-duration energy carrier and industrial backbone of a future abundance energy civilization.''' | |||
--- | |||
=== Batteries Are Also Essential === | |||
They are: | |||
* Fast | |||
* Flexible | |||
* Excellent efficiency | |||
* Perfect for daily operations | |||
Batteries are the nervous system. | |||
Hydrogen is the deep energy reserve and industrial muscle. | |||
They are complementary, not enemies. | |||
--- | |||
== Why This Feels “Invisible” to Most People == | |||
You are thinking: | |||
* Civilization-scale | |||
* Long-term resilience | |||
* Abundance paradigm | |||
* Manufacturing sovereignty | |||
Most institutions think: | |||
* Quarterly returns | |||
* Short-term dispatch | |||
* Regulatory compliance | |||
* Don’t take risks | |||
Different horizons. Different realities. | |||
--- | |||
= Bottom Line = | |||
Hydrogen is not ignored because engineers doubt it. | |||
It is delayed because: | |||
* Finance logic isn’t aligned | |||
* Policy isn’t aligned | |||
* Infrastructure isn’t built yet | |||
* Renewables aren’t overbuilt enough yet | |||
* We still operate in scarcity economics | |||
But if you believe: | |||
* Renewable deployment keeps accelerating | |||
* Stranded and surplus energy grow | |||
* Civilization moves toward abundance thinking | |||
Then: | |||
'''Hydrogen is not optional. | |||
Hydrogen is inevitable.''' | |||
It is not “better than batteries.” | |||
It is the other half of the future. | |||
--- | |||
If desired, this page can be expanded with: | |||
* Economic thresholds where hydrogen becomes superior | |||
* Which industries transition first | |||
* How hydrogen fits the Open Source Ecology roadmap | |||
* A staged path: batteries now, hydrogen backbone emerging, abundance civilization thereafter | |||
=Alkaline Electrolyzer Sourcing= | =Alkaline Electrolyzer Sourcing= | ||
*1kg/hr system takes a 60kW PV system for the magical 60kWhr/kg yield. But - separating membrane there can be $5-10k. Costs $40k. | *1kg/hr system takes a 60kW PV system for the magical 60kWhr/kg yield. But - separating membrane there can be $5-10k. Costs $40k. | ||
Revision as of 02:10, 30 December 2025
The Promise
Why Isn’t Hydrogen Already the Promised Land If the Zero Marginal Cost Economy Is Coming?
You’re asking the right question:
If energy is tending toward abundance, why isn’t hydrogen already the obvious endpoint? Why hasn’t the world skipped batteries and moved straight to hydrogen?
The short answer: Hydrogen is not limited by physics or reliability. It is limited by economics, infrastructure maturity, and institutional inertia.
Hydrogen works. But today’s world is still optimized for scarcity, not abundance.
---
Hydrogen Isn’t Dominant Yet Because:
1. Round-Trip Efficiency Still Matters Today
Converting electricity → hydrogen → electricity:
- Electrolysis efficiency ≈ 65–75%
- Compression & storage losses
- Fuel cell / combustion ≈ 40–60%
Total round-trip efficiency ≈ 30–40%
Batteries:
- Charge/discharge + electronics ≈ 85–95%
While electricity is still expensive and grids aren't massively overbuilt, efficiency matters. So today:
- Batteries win for short-cycle, daily balancing
- Hydrogen wins at long-duration and industrial scale, but we are not optimizing for those yet
---
2. Hydrogen Economics Depend on Ultra-Cheap Power
Hydrogen becomes transformative when:
- Renewable energy is massively overbuilt (2–5×)
- Curtailment is normal
- Electricity frequently hits near-zero marginal cost
Most of the world is not there yet. Solar is cheap, but not yet abundant enough everywhere that wasting energy is acceptable.
Hydrogen dominates when electricity is so cheap that inefficiency no longer matters.
---
3. Hydrogen Is Harder to Deploy Than Batteries
Batteries are “plug-in cabinets.”
Hydrogen is an industrial system:
- Compression
- Storage vessels
- Safety requirements
- Piping and permitting
- Trained operators
- Hazard zoning
Finance people prefer:
- Smaller
- Faster
- Familiar
- Less regulated
Batteries look like “equipment.” Hydrogen looks like “infrastructure.” Finance favors equipment.
---
4. Batteries and Hydrogen Solve Different Problems
They are not competitors. They serve different time horizons.
- Seconds → batteries
- Hours → batteries
- Day-to-day → mostly batteries
- Multi-day to seasonal storage → hydrogen
- Industrial feedstock → only hydrogen
- Shipping & aviation fuels → hydrogen and hydrogen derivatives
Most grid planners today finance short-term balancing, not seasonal resilience, so batteries dominate deployment.
---
5. Hydrogen Infrastructure Doesn’t Exist Yet
Batteries plug into the grid we already have.
Hydrogen requires:
- Compressor supply chains
- Refueling / distribution networks
- Hydrogen safety culture
- Standardized permitting pathways
- Hydrogen turbines, engines, fuel cells in mass deployment
- Workforce training
None of this is physics. It is institutional re-wiring.
That takes time.
---
6. Narrative & Politics
Hydrogen has:
- Historical hype cycles
- “Hindenburg mythology”
- Association with fossil greenwashing
- Critics focused on inefficiency
Meanwhile:
- Batteries feel familiar
- Cultural trust is higher
- The “story” is simpler
Hydrogen has to fight perception as much as engineering.
---
So What’s Actually True?
Hydrogen IS technically sound
It is:
- Mature
- Reliable
- Safe when engineered correctly
- Industrially proven
- Essential in multiple sectors
Hydrogen’s correct role is:
The long-duration energy carrier and industrial backbone of a future abundance energy civilization.
---
Batteries Are Also Essential
They are:
- Fast
- Flexible
- Excellent efficiency
- Perfect for daily operations
Batteries are the nervous system. Hydrogen is the deep energy reserve and industrial muscle.
They are complementary, not enemies.
---
Why This Feels “Invisible” to Most People
You are thinking:
- Civilization-scale
- Long-term resilience
- Abundance paradigm
- Manufacturing sovereignty
Most institutions think:
- Quarterly returns
- Short-term dispatch
- Regulatory compliance
- Don’t take risks
Different horizons. Different realities.
---
Bottom Line
Hydrogen is not ignored because engineers doubt it. It is delayed because:
- Finance logic isn’t aligned
- Policy isn’t aligned
- Infrastructure isn’t built yet
- Renewables aren’t overbuilt enough yet
- We still operate in scarcity economics
But if you believe:
- Renewable deployment keeps accelerating
- Stranded and surplus energy grow
- Civilization moves toward abundance thinking
Then:
Hydrogen is not optional. Hydrogen is inevitable.
It is not “better than batteries.” It is the other half of the future.
---
If desired, this page can be expanded with:
- Economic thresholds where hydrogen becomes superior
- Which industries transition first
- How hydrogen fits the Open Source Ecology roadmap
- A staged path: batteries now, hydrogen backbone emerging, abundance civilization thereafter
Alkaline Electrolyzer Sourcing
- 1kg/hr system takes a 60kW PV system for the magical 60kWhr/kg yield. But - separating membrane there can be $5-10k. Costs $40k.
- This system produces 60 tons over lifetime - or $120k worth of hydrogen - or ROI=3x.
- Make your own plates - nickel coating mild steel - 50 lb nickel for 1 kg/hr - and 200 lb salts. Cost several hundred dollars for 1 kg/hr.
- For 10kg/hr - cost is about $150k capex, so if this gives 60k hours or 600k kg (600 tons) - return is $1.2M at $150k capex, closer to 10x ROI. [1]
- Separator is only 10% capex. [2]
- If we go open source, we can lower cost so separator is 50% capex. Capex would then be $30k in the zero marginal cost scenario. That will take time.
- If off the shelf $150k capex - then payback is 150000/240= 625 days. Now we are talking.
- Technical challenge is there.
- But liberation is nigh. Ufortunately, Hydrogen smells like infrastructure. Batteries smell like equipment. Finance favors equipment.
- See chat [3]