FBA Programs Nomenclature: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''We train civilization engineers, form new enterprises, and upgrade existing ones to build open, regenerative infrastructure at planetary scale.'''
'''We train civilization engineers, form new enterprises, and upgrade existing ones to build open, regenerative infrastructure at planetary scale.'''


=Sequencing=
Nothing launches that requires MJ to be the bottleneck.


=Diagnose Why “Civilization Design (CD)” Is Not Correct =
=Diagnose Why “Civilization Design (CD)” Is Not Correct =

Revision as of 08:36, 20 January 2026

Intent

We train civilization engineers, form new enterprises, and upgrade existing ones to build open, regenerative infrastructure at planetary scale.

Sequencing

Nothing launches that requires MJ to be the bottleneck.

Diagnose Why “Civilization Design (CD)” Is Not Correct

Your instincts are correct. “Civilization Design” name fails in three ways:

  • “Design” is culturally corrupted
    • Implies aesthetics, UX, CAD, architecture-as-style
    • Suggests low consequence, subjective output
    • Attracts people optimized for slides, not systems
  • It undersignals rigor
    • Does not clearly imply engineering discipline
    • Does not imply accountability to reality
    • Sounds adjacent to speculative futurism
  • It undersignals economic seriousness
    • Not obvious that outputs feed enterprise
    • Sounds “pre-business” rather than “proto-industry”