Open Source Photo Server: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 8: Line 8:
*Above hard disk cost is negligible ($5) per year, vs $80/year for storing individual frames. [https://chatgpt.com/share/69a489b3-273c-8010-8b91-1f01d4e555a3]
*Above hard disk cost is negligible ($5) per year, vs $80/year for storing individual frames. [https://chatgpt.com/share/69a489b3-273c-8010-8b91-1f01d4e555a3]
*Probably NextCloud + PhotoPrism is solution. Allows '''unified chronological view''' and folder organization, so you can delete folders if spam. [https://chatgpt.com/share/69a489b3-273c-8010-8b91-1f01d4e555a3]
*Probably NextCloud + PhotoPrism is solution. Allows '''unified chronological view''' and folder organization, so you can delete folders if spam. [https://chatgpt.com/share/69a489b3-273c-8010-8b91-1f01d4e555a3]
*Basic workflow: '''upload, resize, view, admin'''.

Latest revision as of 19:36, 1 March 2026

  • 12-18GB sweet spot, around $20/TB. [1]
  • Use photos.opensourceecology.org/34fldfasdifu243ufonb
  • Strategy for upload access and long term management - Guarded link + weak identity enforcement + hard resource ceilings.
  • 2400px horizontal allows book publishing
  • 8GB gets us about 30 years of monthly workshops at 5000 photos each
  • if time lapse is included (1 min to 1 hour equivalence) - 8 TB gives us 16 years of storage IF photos are stiched already (major compression savings from MP4, not individual frames)
  • Do time lapse at 30 fps, for easy calculation (1 hr realtime to 1 minute time lapse) - using 2 second shooting interval.
  • Above hard disk cost is negligible ($5) per year, vs $80/year for storing individual frames. [2]
  • Probably NextCloud + PhotoPrism is solution. Allows unified chronological view and folder organization, so you can delete folders if spam. [3]
  • Basic workflow: upload, resize, view, admin.