Sustained Economic Growth: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "https://news.northwestern.edu/stories/2025/10/joel-mokyr-wins-nobel-prize-in-economics Mokyr proposes that culture causes innovation: https://www.google.com/search?q=what+is+mokyr+theory+theory+for+sustained+economic+growth And, OSE can resolve the stone age of current innovation, which can be unleashed by true openness, not a tension between intellectual property and freedom of ideas. The latter is incongrous in the OSE model, which is the theory we are trying to pro...") |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
https://www.google.com/search?q=what+is+mokyr+theory+theory+for+sustained+economic+growth | https://www.google.com/search?q=what+is+mokyr+theory+theory+for+sustained+economic+growth | ||
And, OSE can resolve the stone age of current innovation, which can be unleashed by true openness, not a tension between intellectual property and freedom of ideas. The latter is incongrous in the OSE model, which is the theory we are trying to prove: open significantly exceeds proprietary to the point that all global problems are solved faster than they are created. The current world could benefit from this: USA, Ukraine, Iran, North Korea, China, etc. | And, OSE can resolve the stone age of current innovation, which can be unleashed by true openness, not a tension between intellectual property and freedom of ideas (as Mokyr proposes). The latter is incongrous in the OSE model, which is the theory we are trying to prove: open significantly exceeds proprietary to the point that all global problems are solved faster than they are created. The current world could benefit from this: USA, Ukraine, Iran, North Korea, China, etc. | ||
To make change, need to address existing systems stability (ossification) barriers: | |||
*legal frameworks - solution is to operate metalegally prior to 'open source regulatory capture' | |||
*financial structures - create new ones such as [[Abundance Money]] | |||
*entrenched industries - produce more efficiently than they, while providing free R&D that they can use | |||
*geopolitical competition - propose win-win solutions, and in absence thereof - carry a bigger gun. In a transition to abundance, big guns induce compliance from bullies. | |||
https://chatgpt.com/share/69b49c22-b7ac-8010-baad-f082b74e197f | |||
Latest revision as of 23:23, 13 March 2026
https://news.northwestern.edu/stories/2025/10/joel-mokyr-wins-nobel-prize-in-economics
Mokyr proposes that culture causes innovation:
https://www.google.com/search?q=what+is+mokyr+theory+theory+for+sustained+economic+growth
And, OSE can resolve the stone age of current innovation, which can be unleashed by true openness, not a tension between intellectual property and freedom of ideas (as Mokyr proposes). The latter is incongrous in the OSE model, which is the theory we are trying to prove: open significantly exceeds proprietary to the point that all global problems are solved faster than they are created. The current world could benefit from this: USA, Ukraine, Iran, North Korea, China, etc.
To make change, need to address existing systems stability (ossification) barriers:
- legal frameworks - solution is to operate metalegally prior to 'open source regulatory capture'
- financial structures - create new ones such as Abundance Money
- entrenched industries - produce more efficiently than they, while providing free R&D that they can use
- geopolitical competition - propose win-win solutions, and in absence thereof - carry a bigger gun. In a transition to abundance, big guns induce compliance from bullies.
https://chatgpt.com/share/69b49c22-b7ac-8010-baad-f082b74e197f