Essential Thinkers: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 11: Line 11:


<html><iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Kq37CjgVRPM?si=7xMTy_a5NIYpcK_p&amp;start=945" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe></html>
<html><iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Kq37CjgVRPM?si=7xMTy_a5NIYpcK_p&amp;start=945" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe></html>
 
*Utility (regrettable preferences) must not be how outcomes are measured
*Measure of human well-being must be established
*Economy cannot be construed as a 'morality-free zone'
*Repugnant preferences should be checked
*Repugnant preferences should be checked
*Measure of morality must be established
*Economy cannot be construed as a 'morality-free zone'


=Intuition=
=Intuition=

Latest revision as of 03:53, 15 March 2026

Radical Emergence

We cannot deduce what will become.

Moral Economics

https://youtu.be/Kq37CjgVRPM?t=907

  • Utility (regrettable preferences) must not be how outcomes are measured
  • Measure of human well-being must be established
  • Economy cannot be construed as a 'morality-free zone'
  • Repugnant preferences should be checked

Intuition

May be wrong for many System 1 kneejerks.