Structural Fairness: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
* What is a vehicle | * What is a good vehicle for non-parasitic capital and what is the most effective way to obtain it? Begin discussion - [https://chatgpt.com/share/69c8ca7e-b3e8-8325-bd6b-ee3d87d6b499] | ||
=3 forms of capital growth= | =3 forms of capital growth= | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
*PRI and legacy re-distribution | *PRI and legacy re-distribution | ||
*Distributive capital - Capability Capital of Productive Capacity Capital | *Distributive capital - Capability Capital of Productive Capacity Capital | ||
=Significance= | |||
It is Nobel-grade to show that Distributed production + open design + training can generate capital faster than centralized accumulation | |||
=What capital structures allow return without extraction?= | =What capital structures allow return without extraction?= | ||
And to back up - redefine return for the distributive economy. Clearly, if we were redefining the economy, we must first redefine what we return means | And to back up - redefine return for the distributive economy. Clearly, if we were redefining the economy, we must first redefine what we return means | ||
Revision as of 07:03, 29 March 2026
- What is a good vehicle for non-parasitic capital and what is the most effective way to obtain it? Begin discussion - [1]
3 forms of capital growth
- Extractive capital
- PRI and legacy re-distribution
- Distributive capital - Capability Capital of Productive Capacity Capital
Significance
It is Nobel-grade to show that Distributed production + open design + training can generate capital faster than centralized accumulation
What capital structures allow return without extraction?
And to back up - redefine return for the distributive economy. Clearly, if we were redefining the economy, we must first redefine what we return means