Renewable Energy Breeding Rate: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Links) |
(→Links) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
*[[Embodied Energy of PV]] | *[[Embodied Energy of PV]] | ||
*[[Stored Energy of Fossil Fuels vs Renewable Energy]] | *[[Stored Energy of Fossil Fuels vs Renewable Energy]] | ||
*[[Energy Payback Time]] - and bottom line - [[The Energy Question Has an Easy Solution]] | *'''[[Energy Payback Time]]''' - and bottom line - [[The Energy Question Has an Easy Solution]] | ||
*[[Farm Yields Per Acre]] | *[[Farm Yields Per Acre]] | ||
*[[Solar Energy Transition Critique]] | *[[Solar Energy Transition Critique]] | ||
*[[Energy Mix]] | *[[Energy Mix]] | ||
*[[Energy Use by Sector]] | |||
*[[SolSmart]] | |||
Latest revision as of 01:24, 20 April 2026
The rate at which renewable energy is used to double its production. A 500 kW PV system is capable of breeding 1MW of new production (assumes 500kWhr requirement/kg Silicon, or doubling every 6 months. At such a rate, acre-scale energy production with PV allows replication of one facility - in terms of its energy base - every 6 months.
This is correct in principle - https://chatgpt.com/share/69e57b3a-0688-83ea-b997-b5adb6ba366a
Look at details - how does UMG change the balance, and what assumptions they are making on installed systems - and can we break these with building-integrated PV etc.