Ecovolution: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
https://www.zygonjournal.org/article/id/11852/ | https://www.zygonjournal.org/article/id/11852/ | ||
= Mine or Garden? Values Tables = | |||
Source: Thomas Devaney Harblin, ''Mine or Garden? Values and the Change in the Next Hundred Years'', Zygon, Vol. 12, No. 2, June 1977. | |||
= Table 1. The Ethic of Anthropocentric Hedonism: “The Mine” = | |||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
! PAV !! Environmental Impact !! Processes of Cultural Adaptation !! Specific Examples of Cultural-Adaptation Processes | |||
|- | |||
| 1. Maximally desirable present gratification; egoistic hedonism | |||
| Lack of desirable images of the future to motivate collective adaptation; future seen as dystopian | |||
| Extol the “now existence”; extend indebtedness rather than saving and deferred gratification | |||
| Prominence of ''1984'', ''Brave New World'', and ''Fahrenheit 451'' as probable models of the future; high level of indebtedness | |||
|- | |||
| 2. Maximum short-term stability; suppression of tension, conflict, and change whenever possible | |||
| Social change with high collective and personal costs | |||
| Permit change through growth and “trickle-down effect,” but minimize redistribution | |||
| Suburbanization and loss of city tax base; high inflation and unemployment; taxes raised; reliance on public welfare programs to maintain dependents at a minimum level of living | |||
|- | |||
| 3. Materialistic progress and growth; isolation with things for entertainment | |||
| Environment mined rather than nurtured | |||
| Emphasize economically profitable applications of technology; substitute machines for human skills wherever possible; acquire material wealth to demonstrate success | |||
| Spending of public funds on space and military hardware while going door to door to collect cancer-society funds; high-technology medicine amid widespread medical indigence | |||
|- | |||
| 4. Environmental exploitation; environment viewed chiefly as commodity for profit value | |||
| Contamination-depletion of environment; less security regarding continuity of life | |||
| Prefer the “technological fix” to prevention; harbor anthropocentric view of the natural environment | |||
| Chlorination of water supply; use of bottled spring water | |||
|- | |||
| 5. Private property-riparian rights viewed as chief among individual rights; natural and human resources viewed as commodities | |||
| High potential for misuse of natural and human resources upon which a collectivity may be dependent; resource depletion | |||
| Use more intense and costly exploitation techniques; expand exploration; use marginal-quality resources; ignore net-energy principle | |||
| Alaska pipeline; shale oil development; Elk Hills Diversion; expansion of strip mining; substitution of coal for oil and lower air-pollution standards | |||
|- | |||
| 6. Population growth; implying strength, success, and economic health | |||
| Growth exceeding ability to plan for it; future sacrificed to meet pressing immediate needs; competitive demand stimulating inflation | |||
| Accept famine and warfare for containment; employ triage model and lifeboat ethics | |||
| Bangladesh; Biafra; Sahel; Navajo Indian Reservation | |||
|- | |||
| 7. Radical individualism; underestimation of interdependence | |||
| Competition taking precedence over cooperation; individuals who “lose” have little stake in the system and may be willing to destroy it | |||
| See poverty as just and as an acceptable correlate of progress; social inequality becomes more structured | |||
| Slums; lack of low-income housing; high crime rates; common mental-health problems; accepted malnutrition; skid row; poor nursing-home conditions; social Darwinism and work ethic used to explain success | |||
|- | |||
| 8. Personal security through competitive advantage over others | |||
| Increased personal insecurity and fear; increased threat to public order; increased property destruction | |||
| Expand formal social control and surveillance | |||
| Expanded police budgets; use of national guard on campuses; development of computer-linked information networks; infiltration of “subversive” groups | |||
|- | |||
| 9. Persons valued as interchangeable and expendable commodities; utilitarian value | |||
| Widespread alienation and resulting loss of sense of personal responsibility for own actions | |||
| Offer financial and other compensations to the exploited rather than ceasing exploitation; seek identity outside work | |||
| Union pressure for shorter work week and higher wages; Watergate affair; destruction in Lordstown, Ohio, GM plant by workers | |||
|- | |||
| 10. Centralization of authority; representation by experts | |||
| Expanded bureaucratic complexity and ascendancy of large-scale organizations; fostering dependency and waste | |||
| Expand government services; tolerate monopoly in private sphere | |||
| Growth of government; New York City financial crisis; growth of multinational corporations; corporate interference in government process | |||
|- | |||
| 11. “Pragmatic,” reactive, short-term treatment of symptoms of immediate problems; “muddling through” | |||
| Unanticipated consequences of many “independent” individual decisions | |||
| Emphasize “clean-up” operations after the fact | |||
| Lack of comprehensive-integrated public policies; frequent changes in public policies and programs for cosmetic and political purposes | |||
|- | |||
| 12. Science valued chiefly as an adjunct of the marketplace, including warfare capability | |||
| Science more reactive than anticipatory; not as protective of humans as it is capable of being; producing a false sense of security | |||
| Take a curative rather than preventive approach to illness, accidents, or natural disasters | |||
| Lack of national health policy; reduced basic scientific research budgets; disasters explained as the “will of God” rather than the “failure of man” | |||
|} | |||
= Table 2. The Ethic of Preeminent Environmental Consciousness: “The Garden” = | |||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
! AV !! Possible Environmental Impact !! Alternative Cultural-Adaptation Process | |||
|- | |||
| 1. Optimally desirable quality of future life; expectation of cultural continuity motivating sacrifice and change in the present | |||
| Greater personal security; improved mental health of the community; enhanced sense of personal meaningfulness; positive images of the future to flourish | |||
| Construct and promote collectively positive utopias; use educational curriculum and mass media to promote consciousness and imagination | |||
|- | |||
| 2. Dynamic order; understanding positive functions of tension, conflict, and change | |||
| Change more easily accommodated and less resisted; more interesting, humane, and representative political process | |||
| Institute comprehensive-integrated planning; encourage and support development of alternative institutions; bring program diversity in rather than out | |||
|- | |||
| 3. Qualitative culture and human-skill development; technique, handicrafts, interpersonal communications; participation in community | |||
| Environment nurtured and treated as a garden rather than mined | |||
| Experiment with new life-styles; emphasize getting by with less; substitute human skills for machines; “translate” and distribute specialized knowledge | |||
|- | |||
| 4. Environmental control through harmony with laws of nature and respect for carrying-capacity limits | |||
| Less destruction and waste of resources; lower taxes; greater predictability of consequences of actions on the environment | |||
| Institute preventive approach; reduce waste to a minimum; recycle; promote public planning | |||
|- | |||
| 5. Public “ownership” of basic resources — air, water, land; private stewardship as temporary control with accountability | |||
| Greater ability to accomplish the goals of a plan; environmental quality more secure in the long run; reduced social and economic inequality | |||
| Introduce air-, water-, and land-management policies; revise riparian-rights system of owner sovereignty; promote public planning | |||
|- | |||
| 6. Population planning | |||
| Destructive competition and conflict reduced; warfare and famine controlled; slower rate of heat production by man | |||
| Develop a national population policy; support population-control research; raise standard of living of poor who use children as “social security” | |||
|- | |||
| 7. Interdependence; collective security as the means to personal security; respect for human life in all states of dependence | |||
| Increased human control of ecovolution and adaptation process | |||
| Stress theme of interdependence; guarantee that basic human needs are met independently of occupational role; increase worker participation in decisions affecting work role | |||
|- | |||
| 8. Relative social and economic equality | |||
| Reduced destructive conflict; increased sense of stake in maintaining an orderly system | |||
| Effect social change through resource redistribution and greater equality of future resource allocation | |||
|- | |||
| 9. Guaranteed personal dignity and worth of each individual | |||
| Greater sense among the majority of a stake in society; more willingness to participate and take responsibility for resources under one’s stewardship | |||
| Reduce structured inequality; institute tax reform, guaranteed rights, and minimum standards | |||
|- | |||
| 10. Self-reliance and personal efficacy; decentralization to facilitate participation by all in resource-allocation decisions | |||
| Greater initiative and imagination in problem solving; greater political participation; less administrative waste | |||
| Effect genuine revenue sharing; decentralize authority to local governments; reduce administrative complexity | |||
|- | |||
| 11. Planning the future; anticipatory, idealistic solving of ongoing problems; treatment of problem “causes” | |||
| Humankind gains control and responsibility as the “helmsman” of planet Earth | |||
| Legitimize and establish comprehensive-integrated yet decentralized planning as a major national priority | |||
|- | |||
| 12. Science valued as a principal tool of human adaptation, noncommercialized | |||
| Cybernetic adaptation; more enthusiasm and optimism about long-term continuity of human species; enhanced sense of personal security | |||
| Make greater investment in scientific research; promote cybernetic thinking; extend scientific findings so public can understand and apply them | |||
|} | |||
Revision as of 18:27, 3 May 2026
Article Summary - From Zygon Journal of Religion and Science
https://www.zygonjournal.org/article/id/11852/
Mine or Garden? Values Tables
Source: Thomas Devaney Harblin, Mine or Garden? Values and the Change in the Next Hundred Years, Zygon, Vol. 12, No. 2, June 1977.
Table 1. The Ethic of Anthropocentric Hedonism: “The Mine”
| PAV | Environmental Impact | Processes of Cultural Adaptation | Specific Examples of Cultural-Adaptation Processes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Maximally desirable present gratification; egoistic hedonism | Lack of desirable images of the future to motivate collective adaptation; future seen as dystopian | Extol the “now existence”; extend indebtedness rather than saving and deferred gratification | Prominence of 1984, Brave New World, and Fahrenheit 451 as probable models of the future; high level of indebtedness |
| 2. Maximum short-term stability; suppression of tension, conflict, and change whenever possible | Social change with high collective and personal costs | Permit change through growth and “trickle-down effect,” but minimize redistribution | Suburbanization and loss of city tax base; high inflation and unemployment; taxes raised; reliance on public welfare programs to maintain dependents at a minimum level of living |
| 3. Materialistic progress and growth; isolation with things for entertainment | Environment mined rather than nurtured | Emphasize economically profitable applications of technology; substitute machines for human skills wherever possible; acquire material wealth to demonstrate success | Spending of public funds on space and military hardware while going door to door to collect cancer-society funds; high-technology medicine amid widespread medical indigence |
| 4. Environmental exploitation; environment viewed chiefly as commodity for profit value | Contamination-depletion of environment; less security regarding continuity of life | Prefer the “technological fix” to prevention; harbor anthropocentric view of the natural environment | Chlorination of water supply; use of bottled spring water |
| 5. Private property-riparian rights viewed as chief among individual rights; natural and human resources viewed as commodities | High potential for misuse of natural and human resources upon which a collectivity may be dependent; resource depletion | Use more intense and costly exploitation techniques; expand exploration; use marginal-quality resources; ignore net-energy principle | Alaska pipeline; shale oil development; Elk Hills Diversion; expansion of strip mining; substitution of coal for oil and lower air-pollution standards |
| 6. Population growth; implying strength, success, and economic health | Growth exceeding ability to plan for it; future sacrificed to meet pressing immediate needs; competitive demand stimulating inflation | Accept famine and warfare for containment; employ triage model and lifeboat ethics | Bangladesh; Biafra; Sahel; Navajo Indian Reservation |
| 7. Radical individualism; underestimation of interdependence | Competition taking precedence over cooperation; individuals who “lose” have little stake in the system and may be willing to destroy it | See poverty as just and as an acceptable correlate of progress; social inequality becomes more structured | Slums; lack of low-income housing; high crime rates; common mental-health problems; accepted malnutrition; skid row; poor nursing-home conditions; social Darwinism and work ethic used to explain success |
| 8. Personal security through competitive advantage over others | Increased personal insecurity and fear; increased threat to public order; increased property destruction | Expand formal social control and surveillance | Expanded police budgets; use of national guard on campuses; development of computer-linked information networks; infiltration of “subversive” groups |
| 9. Persons valued as interchangeable and expendable commodities; utilitarian value | Widespread alienation and resulting loss of sense of personal responsibility for own actions | Offer financial and other compensations to the exploited rather than ceasing exploitation; seek identity outside work | Union pressure for shorter work week and higher wages; Watergate affair; destruction in Lordstown, Ohio, GM plant by workers |
| 10. Centralization of authority; representation by experts | Expanded bureaucratic complexity and ascendancy of large-scale organizations; fostering dependency and waste | Expand government services; tolerate monopoly in private sphere | Growth of government; New York City financial crisis; growth of multinational corporations; corporate interference in government process |
| 11. “Pragmatic,” reactive, short-term treatment of symptoms of immediate problems; “muddling through” | Unanticipated consequences of many “independent” individual decisions | Emphasize “clean-up” operations after the fact | Lack of comprehensive-integrated public policies; frequent changes in public policies and programs for cosmetic and political purposes |
| 12. Science valued chiefly as an adjunct of the marketplace, including warfare capability | Science more reactive than anticipatory; not as protective of humans as it is capable of being; producing a false sense of security | Take a curative rather than preventive approach to illness, accidents, or natural disasters | Lack of national health policy; reduced basic scientific research budgets; disasters explained as the “will of God” rather than the “failure of man” |
Table 2. The Ethic of Preeminent Environmental Consciousness: “The Garden”
| AV | Possible Environmental Impact | Alternative Cultural-Adaptation Process |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Optimally desirable quality of future life; expectation of cultural continuity motivating sacrifice and change in the present | Greater personal security; improved mental health of the community; enhanced sense of personal meaningfulness; positive images of the future to flourish | Construct and promote collectively positive utopias; use educational curriculum and mass media to promote consciousness and imagination |
| 2. Dynamic order; understanding positive functions of tension, conflict, and change | Change more easily accommodated and less resisted; more interesting, humane, and representative political process | Institute comprehensive-integrated planning; encourage and support development of alternative institutions; bring program diversity in rather than out |
| 3. Qualitative culture and human-skill development; technique, handicrafts, interpersonal communications; participation in community | Environment nurtured and treated as a garden rather than mined | Experiment with new life-styles; emphasize getting by with less; substitute human skills for machines; “translate” and distribute specialized knowledge |
| 4. Environmental control through harmony with laws of nature and respect for carrying-capacity limits | Less destruction and waste of resources; lower taxes; greater predictability of consequences of actions on the environment | Institute preventive approach; reduce waste to a minimum; recycle; promote public planning |
| 5. Public “ownership” of basic resources — air, water, land; private stewardship as temporary control with accountability | Greater ability to accomplish the goals of a plan; environmental quality more secure in the long run; reduced social and economic inequality | Introduce air-, water-, and land-management policies; revise riparian-rights system of owner sovereignty; promote public planning |
| 6. Population planning | Destructive competition and conflict reduced; warfare and famine controlled; slower rate of heat production by man | Develop a national population policy; support population-control research; raise standard of living of poor who use children as “social security” |
| 7. Interdependence; collective security as the means to personal security; respect for human life in all states of dependence | Increased human control of ecovolution and adaptation process | Stress theme of interdependence; guarantee that basic human needs are met independently of occupational role; increase worker participation in decisions affecting work role |
| 8. Relative social and economic equality | Reduced destructive conflict; increased sense of stake in maintaining an orderly system | Effect social change through resource redistribution and greater equality of future resource allocation |
| 9. Guaranteed personal dignity and worth of each individual | Greater sense among the majority of a stake in society; more willingness to participate and take responsibility for resources under one’s stewardship | Reduce structured inequality; institute tax reform, guaranteed rights, and minimum standards |
| 10. Self-reliance and personal efficacy; decentralization to facilitate participation by all in resource-allocation decisions | Greater initiative and imagination in problem solving; greater political participation; less administrative waste | Effect genuine revenue sharing; decentralize authority to local governments; reduce administrative complexity |
| 11. Planning the future; anticipatory, idealistic solving of ongoing problems; treatment of problem “causes” | Humankind gains control and responsibility as the “helmsman” of planet Earth | Legitimize and establish comprehensive-integrated yet decentralized planning as a major national priority |
| 12. Science valued as a principal tool of human adaptation, noncommercialized | Cybernetic adaptation; more enthusiasm and optimism about long-term continuity of human species; enhanced sense of personal security | Make greater investment in scientific research; promote cybernetic thinking; extend scientific findings so public can understand and apply them |