Solar Collector Losses Summary: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
=Introduction=
=Introduction=


When considering the overall performance of linear slat collectors for a linear Fresnel solar concentrator system oriented in the E-W direction, several losses must be considered. For the case of a 4:1 aspect ratio array, such as a 15 foot wide array that stretches for 60 feet in the E-W direction. For this case, if we use 6" slats, we can fit about 16 slats in this area, or a total of 480 square feet (45 sq meters) of solar intercept. We have about 5 kWhr/day per square meter in Maysville, Missouri - from [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Us_pv_annual_may2004.jpg]. We summarize our losses. This includes air mass losses and averages over the seasons - because we are taking empirical data. We are assumining a collector tube with a single layer of insulating glass on the surface.
When considering the overall performance of linear slat collectors for a linear Fresnel solar concentrator system oriented in the E-W direction, several losses must be considered. For the case of a 4:1 aspect ratio array, such as a 15 foot wide array that stretches for 60 feet in the E-W direction. For this case, if we use 6" slats, we can fit about 16 slats in this area, or a total of 480 square feet (45 sq meters) of solar intercept. We have about 5 kWhr/day per square meter in Maysville, Missouri - from [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Us_pv_annual_may2004.jpg]. We summarize our losses. This includes air mass losses and averages over the seasons - because we are taking empirical data. We are assumining a collector tube with a single layer of insulating glass on the surface. We are considering a case where we are letting the collector tube heat up to 650K.
 


#Reflection losses from mirrors - 1%, assuming 99% reflective mirrors - and assuming that 4% reflection from glass is reflected back at the collector tube
#Reflection losses from mirrors - 1%, assuming 99% reflective mirrors - and assuming that 4% reflection from glass is reflected back at the collector tube
#Edge Lossses - 10% - from [[Solar_Collector_Calculations#Losses_due_to_edge_effects_only]] - about if we consider the 6 hours of highest sun during the day, or from 9:30 AM - 2:30 PM
#Edge Lossses - 10% - from [[Solar_Collector_Calculations#Losses_due_to_edge_effects_only]] - about if we consider the 6 hours of highest sun during the day, or from 9:30 AM - 2:30 PM
#Reflection from collector tube glass - 4% loss
#Reflection from collector tube glass - 4% loss
#Radiation losses from collector tube -  
#Radiation losses from collector tube - 7.5 kW with emissivity = .25 selective coating
 
#Assume that the absorptance
 
 
 


=Radiation Loss Calculation=
=Radiation Loss Calculation=

Revision as of 18:02, 31 January 2009

Introduction

When considering the overall performance of linear slat collectors for a linear Fresnel solar concentrator system oriented in the E-W direction, several losses must be considered. For the case of a 4:1 aspect ratio array, such as a 15 foot wide array that stretches for 60 feet in the E-W direction. For this case, if we use 6" slats, we can fit about 16 slats in this area, or a total of 480 square feet (45 sq meters) of solar intercept. We have about 5 kWhr/day per square meter in Maysville, Missouri - from [1]. We summarize our losses. This includes air mass losses and averages over the seasons - because we are taking empirical data. We are assumining a collector tube with a single layer of insulating glass on the surface. We are considering a case where we are letting the collector tube heat up to 650K.

  1. Reflection losses from mirrors - 1%, assuming 99% reflective mirrors - and assuming that 4% reflection from glass is reflected back at the collector tube
  2. Edge Lossses - 10% - from Solar_Collector_Calculations#Losses_due_to_edge_effects_only - about if we consider the 6 hours of highest sun during the day, or from 9:30 AM - 2:30 PM
  3. Reflection from collector tube glass - 4% loss
  4. Radiation losses from collector tube - 7.5 kW with emissivity = .25 selective coating
  5. Assume that the absorptance

Radiation Loss Calculation

Blackbody radiation calculator shows the following losses for a 60' tube:

Blackbody60.jpg

This takes a 650K optimal collector temperature, with a 2" tube, 20m long. This collector tube area = 2.9 sq meters.

  • 30 kW losses mean 2/3 of the incoming 45 kW of solar gain.
  • Reduce this by selective coating of emissivity = 0.25 for Solkote, and we get 7.5 kW of radiation loss

Setting the temperature to 650K gives us