Open-Sourcing Industry Standards: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
*Product manuals - these are good at exploded part diagrams or design notes | *Product manuals - these are good at exploded part diagrams or design notes | ||
*Specifications on websites - these reveal performance criteria for open source equivalnets | *Specifications on websites - these reveal performance criteria for open source equivalnets | ||
*Knowledge embodies in [[SME]]s and Industry organizations | |||
*Practical knowlege from old-timers - people who have a certain expertise | |||
=Impelementation= | |||
For copies of physical products: | |||
If you have an economically significant, important machine - contact Brianna at kufadesigns dot com to plan how we can inspect and document the functionality of your machine. | If you have an economically significant, important machine - contact Brianna at kufadesigns dot com to plan how we can inspect and document the functionality of your machine. | ||
[[Category:XM]] | [[Category:XM]] |
Latest revision as of 05:16, 12 March 2012
General strategy for open-sourcing the economy, and physical products in particular - is to examine existing access to product design:
- Physical machines that can be examined for their mechanisms and functionality
- Patent searches - which reveal functional mechanism but not details of actual build
- Product manuals - these are good at exploded part diagrams or design notes
- Specifications on websites - these reveal performance criteria for open source equivalnets
- Knowledge embodies in SMEs and Industry organizations
- Practical knowlege from old-timers - people who have a certain expertise
Impelementation
For copies of physical products:
If you have an economically significant, important machine - contact Brianna at kufadesigns dot com to plan how we can inspect and document the functionality of your machine.