XM Review Standards: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
Review can be useful at the investment-searching stage, when proper review via third parties provides the confidence in an investment.
Review can be useful at the investment-searching stage, when proper review via third parties provides the confidence in an investment.


Review is ufeful after the design stage - when the design can be
Review is ufeful after the design stage - when the design can be reviewed for:
*Manufacturability
*Redesign for easy prototyping (such as box beam and


=Advisors vs. Subject Matter Experts=
Advisors, and in particular advisors who can be accessed within minutes of a problem being defined, are extremely useful - in their capacity for instant removal of blocks and


#Define Problem Statement to involve others in development for transperancy and ability of both parties to assess the situation
#Define Problem Statement to involve others in development for transperancy and ability of both parties to assess the situation

Revision as of 03:36, 26 March 2012

Review Standards

Review is useful at many points of a development process. Together with Test-Driven Development, this can provide feedback necessary for project success - by converging on workable solutions more quickly than 'reinventing the wheel.'

Review can be useful at the investment-searching stage, when proper review via third parties provides the confidence in an investment.

Review is ufeful after the design stage - when the design can be reviewed for:

  • Manufacturability
  • Redesign for easy prototyping (such as box beam and

Advisors vs. Subject Matter Experts

Advisors, and in particular advisors who can be accessed within minutes of a problem being defined, are extremely useful - in their capacity for instant removal of blocks and

  1. Define Problem Statement to involve others in development for transperancy and ability of both parties to assess the situation
    1. Quick video can show this.
    2. Introduce yourself if it's your first video
    3. For hardware, take object, picture, or design - and discuss it in an under 5 minute video for the component.
    4. Potentially set up space for this in XM Project Page
  2. CAD available for review - CAD is prerequisite
    1. In absence of CAD, drawings may suffice
  3. Static pictures for key mechanisms and processes presented clearly
    1. XM Project Page has review materials in a separate window?
  4. Everything documented at x Project XM Review page on wiki