XM Review Standards: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Review can be useful at the investment-searching stage, when proper review via third parties provides the confidence in an investment. | Review can be useful at the investment-searching stage, when proper review via third parties provides the confidence in an investment. | ||
Review is ufeful after the design stage - when the design can be | Review is ufeful after the design stage - when the design can be reviewed for: | ||
*Manufacturability | |||
*Redesign for easy prototyping (such as box beam and | |||
=Advisors vs. Subject Matter Experts= | |||
Advisors, and in particular advisors who can be accessed within minutes of a problem being defined, are extremely useful - in their capacity for instant removal of blocks and | |||
#Define Problem Statement to involve others in development for transperancy and ability of both parties to assess the situation | #Define Problem Statement to involve others in development for transperancy and ability of both parties to assess the situation |
Revision as of 03:36, 26 March 2012
Review Standards
Review is useful at many points of a development process. Together with Test-Driven Development, this can provide feedback necessary for project success - by converging on workable solutions more quickly than 'reinventing the wheel.'
Review can be useful at the investment-searching stage, when proper review via third parties provides the confidence in an investment.
Review is ufeful after the design stage - when the design can be reviewed for:
- Manufacturability
- Redesign for easy prototyping (such as box beam and
Advisors vs. Subject Matter Experts
Advisors, and in particular advisors who can be accessed within minutes of a problem being defined, are extremely useful - in their capacity for instant removal of blocks and
- Define Problem Statement to involve others in development for transperancy and ability of both parties to assess the situation
- Quick video can show this.
- Introduce yourself if it's your first video
- For hardware, take object, picture, or design - and discuss it in an under 5 minute video for the component.
- Potentially set up space for this in XM Project Page
- CAD available for review - CAD is prerequisite
- In absence of CAD, drawings may suffice
- Static pictures for key mechanisms and processes presented clearly
- XM Project Page has review materials in a separate window?
- Everything documented at x Project XM Review page on wiki