XM SEBD Assessment Procedure: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Once any SEBD is documented, it should be assessed for possibility to break the technology down into further components. The goal is to break down a technology into the smallest size possible to allow for simultaneous development by a large, distributed team. The large team can work independently once the interface between the components has been identified clearly.
Once any SEBD is documented, it should be assessed for possibility to break the technology down into further components. The goal is to break down a technology into the smallest size possible to allow for simultaneous development by a large, distributed team. The large team can work independently once the interface between the components has been identified clearly.


The Product Owner should perform the assessment. Crowdsourced assessments are welcome under these conditions:
The Product Owner should perform the assessment. Crowdsourced assessments are welcome if:


*Contributor lists their qualifications which allow the contributor to make a grounded assessment of the work product
*Contributor lists qualifications which allow the contributor to make a grounded assessment of the work product
*Assessment is based on experience, not theory
*Contributor acknowledges adherence of the assessment to [[OSE Specifications]]
*Contributor acknowledges adherence of the assessment to [[OSE Specifications]]


[[Category:XM]]
[[Category:XM]]

Revision as of 04:51, 27 March 2012

Once any SEBD is documented, it should be assessed for possibility to break the technology down into further components. The goal is to break down a technology into the smallest size possible to allow for simultaneous development by a large, distributed team. The large team can work independently once the interface between the components has been identified clearly.

The Product Owner should perform the assessment. Crowdsourced assessments are welcome if:

  • Contributor lists qualifications which allow the contributor to make a grounded assessment of the work product
  • Assessment is based on experience, not theory
  • Contributor acknowledges adherence of the assessment to OSE Specifications