Architecture of Participation: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "From Baldwin and Clark - conclusions are: *Modularity (in code architecture) inventivises development contributions *Modularity also helps to address the the Freeloader Dile...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
From Baldwin and Clark - conclusions are: | From Baldwin and Clark - conclusions are: | ||
*Modularity (in code architecture) | *Modularity (in code architecture) incentivises development contributions | ||
*Modularity also helps to address the the [[Freeloader Dilemma]] | *Modularity also helps to address the the [[Freeloader Dilemma]] | ||
Latest revision as of 17:17, 6 August 2019
From Baldwin and Clark - conclusions are:
- Modularity (in code architecture) incentivises development contributions
- Modularity also helps to address the the Freeloader Dilemma
A concept published by:
- Baldwin and Clark - 2005 - [1]
- Based on 2002 work of Aoki
- O'Reilly - 2004 - [2]