Talk:Microfluidics: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "This needs to be integrated into the wiki. There are way too many orphaned pages like this on the wiki already --~~~~") |
No edit summary |
||
(9 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This | This page was originally called "low cost diagnostics". This is a much broader topic than just microfluidics, which is only one aspect of it. Things like biosensors may not have anything to do with microfluidics. --[[User:Rasmus|Rasmus]] | ||
:Ok, I didn't realize that when I moved it. However, I think Microfluidics is a better subject for a page. Here's why: Having a 'Microfluidics' page, covering the various uses of microfluidics (agriculture, medical diagnostics etc.) is categorizing one piece of hardware with multiple uses; the hardware takes primacy. The title 'Low-cost diagnostics' covers one use, with multiple pieces of hardware; the uses take primacy. This is an open hardware wiki, so I think categorizing it as hardware is better, especially if we could get an open-source method of fabbing microfluidic chips. Microfluidics is one of the most potentially revolutionary technologies emerging just now, and open-source digitally-fabricated microfluidic chips could make a huge difference to people's lives.--[[User:Conor|Conor]] 12:15, 21 February 2011 (PST) | |||
::OK, makes sense - As it stands right now, the page is still a mix of various technologies. Over time, I will clean it up. Let's leave the title as is and eventually add more information that is specifically about microfluidics. There will very likely be open source/DIY possibilities. I need to look into that.--[[User:Rasmus|Rasmus]] | |||
:::I just checked out that shrinky-dink link you posted. That's quite amazing. It really sounds like low-cost, open-source, flexible microfluidics is a possibility. We should really try to get proper open-hardware instructions here. --[[User:Conor|Conor]] 12:41, 21 February 2011 (PST) |
Latest revision as of 20:41, 21 February 2011
This page was originally called "low cost diagnostics". This is a much broader topic than just microfluidics, which is only one aspect of it. Things like biosensors may not have anything to do with microfluidics. --Rasmus
- Ok, I didn't realize that when I moved it. However, I think Microfluidics is a better subject for a page. Here's why: Having a 'Microfluidics' page, covering the various uses of microfluidics (agriculture, medical diagnostics etc.) is categorizing one piece of hardware with multiple uses; the hardware takes primacy. The title 'Low-cost diagnostics' covers one use, with multiple pieces of hardware; the uses take primacy. This is an open hardware wiki, so I think categorizing it as hardware is better, especially if we could get an open-source method of fabbing microfluidic chips. Microfluidics is one of the most potentially revolutionary technologies emerging just now, and open-source digitally-fabricated microfluidic chips could make a huge difference to people's lives.--Conor 12:15, 21 February 2011 (PST)
- OK, makes sense - As it stands right now, the page is still a mix of various technologies. Over time, I will clean it up. Let's leave the title as is and eventually add more information that is specifically about microfluidics. There will very likely be open source/DIY possibilities. I need to look into that.--Rasmus
- I just checked out that shrinky-dink link you posted. That's quite amazing. It really sounds like low-cost, open-source, flexible microfluidics is a possibility. We should really try to get proper open-hardware instructions here. --Conor 12:41, 21 February 2011 (PST)
- OK, makes sense - As it stands right now, the page is still a mix of various technologies. Over time, I will clean it up. Let's leave the title as is and eventually add more information that is specifically about microfluidics. There will very likely be open source/DIY possibilities. I need to look into that.--Rasmus