Artificial Material Scarcity: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
(Replaced content with "Artificial Scarcity related to materials and energy resources.")
 
(38 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Artificial material scarcity - colloquially spoken as Artificial Scarcity in the [[GVCS TED Talk]] - is a condition where in the absolute abundance of material resources - namely: rocks, plants, water, sunlight, air - from which all wealth is created - their distribution is poor - causing poverty, hunger, resource conflicts, corruption, social ills, psychological disintegration, loss of meaning, etc.
[[Artificial Scarcity]] related to materials and energy resources.
 
Artificial scarcity involves high efficiency of production and low efficiency of distributing the resulting wealth among the populace. Great abundance is enjoyed by the few, and deprivation is suffered by most. This is confirmed by standard data on the distribution of wealth in society, where it is generally accepted as true that a decreasing fraction of the population continues to reap an increasing portion of income. See [[Gini Coefficient]]
 
This is the status quo which may be addressed via the [[Open Source Economy]].
 
The [[Open Source Ecology Paradigm]] works on creating the open source economy by creating [[Distributive Enterprise]].
 
 
See [[Practical Post-Scarcity Video]]:
 
<html>
<iframe src="https://player.vimeo.com/video/36360891?title=0&amp;byline=0&amp;portrait=0" width="600" height="340" frameborder="0" webkitAllowFullScreen mozallowfullscreen allowFullScreen></iframe><p><a href="http://vimeo.com/33701676">Practical Post Scarcity</a> from <a href="http://vimeo.com/opensourceecology">Open Source Ecology</a> on <a href="http://vimeo.com">Vimeo</a>.</p>
</html>
 
=Practical Examples=
==Evolution from Salesmen to Producers to Environmentalists to Community Stewards=
In the case of salespeople, we could predict a transition to open source product development. The evolution is the reduction of profit from resale - when an individual captures only a small fraction of value. This is not [[Productive Value]], but [[Parasitic Value]] - where resellers capture a small part of the productive value of somebody else.
 
Naturally, this scenario leads to minimum profits - and the tendency to maximize the number of sales to make a living. This contributes to a negative feedback of advertising and consumerism to push excess goods onto the population. This does not help the world because it is a runaway condition.
 
On the other hand, if a person is a producer, and the entry barriers to production are lowered via open source design and equipment - then the former resellers could become producers. They gain skills, and capture the full value of production. The transition to producerism appears inevitable as more open information and lower cost tools become available. The limiting factor is the producers' willingness to learn - as this will determine the limits of complexity created - and thus limits of value capture.
 
However, the producer scenario also leads to minimum profit as more people engage in this. So the next step is the producer becoming their own materials supplier. This is a step towards environmental consciousness - as materials come from nature and stewarding production implies stewarding natural resources - which are the feedstocks of production.
 
The producer who also produces their feedstocks is able to capture the full worth of value added to raw resources. Information and energy is added to raw resources to turn them into valuable products.
 
[[Category:Book]]

Latest revision as of 02:55, 1 May 2025

Artificial Scarcity related to materials and energy resources.