GFCI: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
GFCI is US/Canada-specific terminology. The more general term is residual-current circuit breaker (RCCD) [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Residual-current_device]
{{Hint|Do not listen to this information as it may be incorrect or misleading, and the topic covered relates to electrical safety. There is a risk of personal injury or death if one does not understand what they are doing with electricity}}
{{Hint|Do not listen to this information as it may be incorrect or misleading, and the topic covered relates to electrical safety. There is a risk of personal injury or death if one does not understand what they are doing with electricity}}


=Notes=
=Notes=
*Note that a GFCI does NOT protect against overcurrent or overload. Thus, a device that uses a GFCI must have a circuit breaker upstream of it to prevent overload or fire hazard.
*Note that a GFCI does NOT protect against overcurrent or overload. Thus, a device that uses a GFCI must have a circuit breaker upstream of it to prevent overload or fire hazard.
=Protecting Downstream Outlets=
A useful feature of a GFCI outlet is that if you connect outlets downstream through the GFCI - the downstream outlets will also be protected with the GFCI functionality. See:
<html><iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Ps3k2mdjgek" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe></html>


=Data Collection=
=Data Collection=
I just got shocked from a functioning GFCI, so this is a real data point. I tested the GFCI with the test button. It works. Then I touched a part (3D Printer heat bed) that had a frayed wire (not intentionally). I think what happened was that I got no shock when touching with one hand, but then I touched it with my second hand on another part of the 3D Printer bed - which I am led to believe closed the circuit to a return wire. The GFCI did not trip. I don't fully understand what exactly happened, but this answer is consistent with me closing the circuit, so there was no leakage to ground. I think if the device were grounded, a breaker would have tripped, so it looks like grounding a GFCI-protected device is a good idea.
I just got shocked from a functioning GFCI, so this is a real data point. I tested the GFCI with the test button. It works. Then I touched a part (3D Printer heat bed) that had a frayed wire (not intentionally). I think what happened was that I got no shock when touching with one hand, but then I touched it with my second hand on another part of the 3D Printer bed - which I am led to believe closed the circuit to a return wire. The GFCI did not trip. I don't fully understand what exactly happened, but this answer is consistent with me closing the circuit, so there was no leakage to ground. I think if the device were grounded, a breaker would have tripped, so it looks like grounding a GFCI-protected device is a good idea.


See Stack Exchange - https://diy.stackexchange.com/questions/81251/does-a-gfci-receptacle-provide-overcurrent-protection
See Stack Exchange - https://diy.stackexchange.com/questions/10666/is-it-possible-to-be-electrocuted-from-a-properly-functioning-gfci-circuit/


=Sourcing=
=Sourcing=
Line 14: Line 21:


[http://www.amazon.com/Tower-Manufacturing-30339005-3-Wire-Adapter/dp/B000P8COIS/ref=sr_1_6?s=hi&ie=UTF8&qid=1342068173&sr=1-6&keywords=gfci+plug GFCI Adapter (Standard Male and Female Plug Ends)]
[http://www.amazon.com/Tower-Manufacturing-30339005-3-Wire-Adapter/dp/B000P8COIS/ref=sr_1_6?s=hi&ie=UTF8&qid=1342068173&sr=1-6&keywords=gfci+plug GFCI Adapter (Standard Male and Female Plug Ends)]
=By Country=
*UK version - [https://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B00KGSFYS4/ref=ox_sc_act_title_2?smid=A3P5ROKL5A1OLE&psc=1]


=Links=
=Links=
*[[GFCI Outlets]]
*[[GFCI Outlets]]

Latest revision as of 22:12, 15 August 2020

GFCI is US/Canada-specific terminology. The more general term is residual-current circuit breaker (RCCD) [1]


HintLightbulb.png Hint: Do not listen to this information as it may be incorrect or misleading, and the topic covered relates to electrical safety. There is a risk of personal injury or death if one does not understand what they are doing with electricity

Notes

  • Note that a GFCI does NOT protect against overcurrent or overload. Thus, a device that uses a GFCI must have a circuit breaker upstream of it to prevent overload or fire hazard.

Protecting Downstream Outlets

A useful feature of a GFCI outlet is that if you connect outlets downstream through the GFCI - the downstream outlets will also be protected with the GFCI functionality. See:

Data Collection

I just got shocked from a functioning GFCI, so this is a real data point. I tested the GFCI with the test button. It works. Then I touched a part (3D Printer heat bed) that had a frayed wire (not intentionally). I think what happened was that I got no shock when touching with one hand, but then I touched it with my second hand on another part of the 3D Printer bed - which I am led to believe closed the circuit to a return wire. The GFCI did not trip. I don't fully understand what exactly happened, but this answer is consistent with me closing the circuit, so there was no leakage to ground. I think if the device were grounded, a breaker would have tripped, so it looks like grounding a GFCI-protected device is a good idea.

See Stack Exchange - https://diy.stackexchange.com/questions/10666/is-it-possible-to-be-electrocuted-from-a-properly-functioning-gfci-circuit/

Sourcing

GFCI Plug (Needs to be Wired at 1 End)

GFCI Adapter (Standard Male and Female Plug Ends)

By Country

  • UK version - [2]

Links