Pumped Hydroelectric Storage: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
(19 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
=Basics=
*A Form of a "Gravity Battery" using water as the mass
*Essentially [[Hydroelectic Dams]] but modified to work "in reverse"
*So it functions as usual, but can be reversed, or use seperate pumps to store energy
=Seed Eco-Home Variant - 3 Story Seed Eco-Home=
*Pump water from basement to top
*20 foot head
*700 sf area = 88 totes if stacked. Tote is 2000 kg over 16 sf or 250 kg dead load psf
**Biggest challenge is the structural integrity for 250 psf. For comparison, garden roofs are 100 psf rating [https://up.codes/s/minimum-roof-live-loads].
*88x7 m *1000 kg *G=1.7 kWhr
*[[Pelton Turbine]] is 80% edficient, so we have 1.3 kWhr
*On a [[Third Industrial Revolution]] microgrid, that would mean 1 MWhr available in a 1000 person town.
*Adding to this for 18 hours of the day at 50 W - wind turbines make a lot of sense. Merely a 50W capture from a turbine adds up to almost a kWhr in 18 hours when the 'sun doesn't shine'.
=Marcin Calculations for [[FeF]] =
Calling the engineers in the audience - I just ran through some calculations on the feasibility of water pumping storage at Factor e Farm, our facility. The numbers look really good on paper. The drawing shows two quarter acre ponds - the contour lines are at 1 foot elevation intervals, so 30 foot drop between the ponds. The calculation yields 24kWhr of energy storage from this using proven microhydro technology - where the elevated pond serves as a reserve that can be pumped during daylight for gravity water storage. This is an open call for review of the calculations, see below.
Calling the engineers in the audience - I just ran through some calculations on the feasibility of water pumping storage at Factor e Farm, our facility. The numbers look really good on paper. The drawing shows two quarter acre ponds - the contour lines are at 1 foot elevation intervals, so 30 foot drop between the ponds. The calculation yields 24kWhr of energy storage from this using proven microhydro technology - where the elevated pond serves as a reserve that can be pumped during daylight for gravity water storage. This is an open call for review of the calculations, see below.


Line 8: Line 25:


THAT IS over 24 HOURS OF 1KW OF POWER!!!!!!!!!!!!
THAT IS over 24 HOURS OF 1KW OF POWER!!!!!!!!!!!!
Note Pelton turbines are 90% efficient [https://www.renewablesfirst.co.uk/hydropower/hydropower-learning-centre/pelton-and-turgo-turbines/#:~:text=Pelton%20turbines%20can%20reach%20up,design%20of%20the%20spear%2Djet.]


Cost will be $1.5k in 4" pipe (about 1000 ft), $1k in power equipment, $10k in excavation + trenching for 2 ponds. If we have our own dozer, that will be $3k system cost.
Cost will be $1.5k in 4" pipe (about 1000 ft), $1k in power equipment, $10k in excavation + trenching for 2 ponds. If we have our own dozer, that will be $3k system cost.
$3k for 24kWhr of power storage appears to beat batteries by a factor of 5-10 in cost.
$3k for 24kWhr ($125/kwhr) of power storage appears to be comparable to batteries (38 whr costs $3 - or $75/kWhr for lithium batteries (which are not sustainable)). But lithium bats live 5 years or so - whereas PVC lives 400 years - so the gravity pond is a 100x better solution if we internalize lifetime design.
Sure looks good on paper. Are these numbers sound?
Sure looks good on paper. Are these numbers sound?


It gets more interesting with 3D printing. Each piece of pipe of 4", 10' long is $10, but if we 3D print these - then the cost of [[4" PVC Pipe]] drops to 65 cents per 10 foot section (10 cents per lb from post-consumer waste plastic)
'''2019 addendum:''' It gets more interesting with 3D printing. Each piece of pipe of 4", 10' long is $10, but if we 3D print these - then the cost of [[4" PVC Pipe]] drops to 65 cents per 10 foot section (10 cents per lb from post-consumer waste plastic). So $100 per 24kWhrs of power. $5/kWhr cost is 10x better than batteries, and 1000x better over a lifetime.


If this works, we will consider this project for a future workshop in permaculture and open source technology, like the ones we're running now (http://bit.ly/1lHE2fw). If anyone can help us develop this project, please let me know.  
If this works, we will consider this project for a future workshop in permaculture and open source technology, like the ones we're running now (http://bit.ly/1lHE2fw). If anyone can help us develop this project, please let me know.  


[[Image:phs.jpg]]
[[Image:phs.jpg]]
'''2022 Addendum''' - if we do a 1 acre pond, 24 feet deep- then we have 16x the energy storage. The 24kW hrs turns into 384kWhr. This would be the scale required for a village enterprise.
===Option B===
Take a little further north, 18ft of head instead of 30.
*30 meter on each side pond, 2m deep - is 2000 cu m. Energy - MGH = 2M kg *10u*6u = 100MJ. That is 27 kWhr. Hydro is 90% efficient.[https://www.usbr.gov/power/edu/pamphlet.pdf]. Take 50% for our system. That is 12kWhr. could be good. Even if it's 6 kWhr - that is sufficient for an efficient house.
=Option C=
*Housetop - 32 totes. 8800 gal. 40 cu m.
*Rise would be 20', almost 7m.
*Mgh=40,000*10*7=almost 3 MJ. Or 0.8 kwhr.
=Working Doc=
=Working Doc=
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1FXZjGWcSwAZYxykedo9sqP4YGUlJRRiDUnYzKFTzHnI/edit#slide=id.g5c3be0ce2d_1_28
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1FXZjGWcSwAZYxykedo9sqP4YGUlJRRiDUnYzKFTzHnI/edit#slide=id.g5c3be0ce2d_1_28


=References=
==References==
*Pumped Hydroelectric Storage, Chi-Jen Yang - [[File:phs.pdf]]
*Pumped Hydroelectric Storage, Chi-Jen Yang - [[File:phs.pdf]]


=Turbine Sources=
==Turbine Sources==
*[[Pelton Wheel]] only - [http://www.thesolarbiz.com/Harris-Hydro-Pelton-Wheel#gsc.tab=0]
*[[Pelton Wheel]] only - [http://www.thesolarbiz.com/Harris-Hydro-Pelton-Wheel#gsc.tab=0]
*From Dan, look ethical and have good equipment - [http://www.rockyhydro.com/]
*From Dan, look ethical and have good equipment - [http://www.rockyhydro.com/]
Line 31: Line 62:
*Survey - http://www.zero.no/publikasjoner/small-scale-water-current-turbines-for-river-applications.pdf
*Survey - http://www.zero.no/publikasjoner/small-scale-water-current-turbines-for-river-applications.pdf


=Contacts=
==Contacts==
Contacted Regrarians, Permies, TED Fellows on Facebook.
Contacted Regrarians, Permies, TED Fellows on Facebook.


Line 43: Line 74:
If this works, we will consider this project for a future workshop in permaculture and open source technology, like the ones we're running now (http://bit.ly/1lHE2fw). If anyone can help us develop this project, please let me know.
If this works, we will consider this project for a future workshop in permaculture and open source technology, like the ones we're running now (http://bit.ly/1lHE2fw). If anyone can help us develop this project, please let me know.


=Other Types of Gravity Storage=
==Other Types of Gravity Storage==
*Concrete - [https://qz.com/1302711/to-hit-climate-goals-bill-gates-and-his-billionaire-friends-are-betting-on-energy-storage/]
*Concrete - [https://qz.com/1302711/to-hit-climate-goals-bill-gates-and-his-billionaire-friends-are-betting-on-energy-storage/]
*[[Concrete Energy Storage Calculations]]
*[[Concrete Energy Storage Calculations]]


=Links=
==Links==
* Alexander Slocum, MIT - ocean windmill storage - [http://www.technologyreview.com/article/517946/a-power-geek-making-stuff/]
* Alexander Slocum, MIT - ocean windmill storage - [http://www.technologyreview.com/article/517946/a-power-geek-making-stuff/]
* other OSE Wiki pages: [[Pelton Wheel]]
 
=Internal Links=
*[[Pelton Wheel]]
*Flow battery - the cheapest form of chemical storage possible - $1/kwhr for materials, and $10/kwhr for balance of system
*Flow battery - the cheapest form of chemical storage possible - $1/kwhr for materials, and $10/kwhr for balance of system
=External Links=
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pumped-storage_hydroelectricity The Wikipedia Page on Pumped Hydroelectric Storage]
*[https://youtu.be/JSgd-QhLHRI A Video by the Youtube Channel "Real Engineering" Titled "The Truth About Pumped Hydro" ] (It mainly mentions the issues of water use, and more importantly geographic availability)
[[Category:Energy]]
[[Category:Energy]]

Latest revision as of 03:40, 16 March 2025

Basics

  • A Form of a "Gravity Battery" using water as the mass
  • Essentially Hydroelectic Dams but modified to work "in reverse"
  • So it functions as usual, but can be reversed, or use seperate pumps to store energy


Seed Eco-Home Variant - 3 Story Seed Eco-Home

  • Pump water from basement to top
  • 20 foot head
  • 700 sf area = 88 totes if stacked. Tote is 2000 kg over 16 sf or 250 kg dead load psf
    • Biggest challenge is the structural integrity for 250 psf. For comparison, garden roofs are 100 psf rating [1].
  • 88x7 m *1000 kg *G=1.7 kWhr
  • Pelton Turbine is 80% edficient, so we have 1.3 kWhr
  • On a Third Industrial Revolution microgrid, that would mean 1 MWhr available in a 1000 person town.
  • Adding to this for 18 hours of the day at 50 W - wind turbines make a lot of sense. Merely a 50W capture from a turbine adds up to almost a kWhr in 18 hours when the 'sun doesn't shine'.

Marcin Calculations for FeF

Calling the engineers in the audience - I just ran through some calculations on the feasibility of water pumping storage at Factor e Farm, our facility. The numbers look really good on paper. The drawing shows two quarter acre ponds - the contour lines are at 1 foot elevation intervals, so 30 foot drop between the ponds. The calculation yields 24kWhr of energy storage from this using proven microhydro technology - where the elevated pond serves as a reserve that can be pumped during daylight for gravity water storage. This is an open call for review of the calculations, see below.

Explanation:

Can we consider a storage hydro system that pumps during the day and generates electricity by night? Quick calculations: 1/4 acre pond, 6 foot deep. That is about 2000 cubic meters of water. Take another pond 10 m lower. The energy of water going from pond 1 to pond 2 (see drawing attached) is MgH = energy = [2000 cu m]x[1000kg/cu m]x[10 m/s^2]x[10 m] = 200 MJ 200 MJ = 200 MW for 1 second, or 200 kW for 1000 seconds, or 2 kW for 100,000 seconds - but assume 50% system efficiency (85% pumping, 85% generating, then 20% friction loss)

THAT IS over 24 HOURS OF 1KW OF POWER!!!!!!!!!!!!

Note Pelton turbines are 90% efficient [2]

Cost will be $1.5k in 4" pipe (about 1000 ft), $1k in power equipment, $10k in excavation + trenching for 2 ponds. If we have our own dozer, that will be $3k system cost. $3k for 24kWhr ($125/kwhr) of power storage appears to be comparable to batteries (38 whr costs $3 - or $75/kWhr for lithium batteries (which are not sustainable)). But lithium bats live 5 years or so - whereas PVC lives 400 years - so the gravity pond is a 100x better solution if we internalize lifetime design. Sure looks good on paper. Are these numbers sound?

2019 addendum: It gets more interesting with 3D printing. Each piece of pipe of 4", 10' long is $10, but if we 3D print these - then the cost of 4" PVC Pipe drops to 65 cents per 10 foot section (10 cents per lb from post-consumer waste plastic). So $100 per 24kWhrs of power. $5/kWhr cost is 10x better than batteries, and 1000x better over a lifetime.

If this works, we will consider this project for a future workshop in permaculture and open source technology, like the ones we're running now (http://bit.ly/1lHE2fw). If anyone can help us develop this project, please let me know.

Phs.jpg

2022 Addendum - if we do a 1 acre pond, 24 feet deep- then we have 16x the energy storage. The 24kW hrs turns into 384kWhr. This would be the scale required for a village enterprise.

Option B

Take a little further north, 18ft of head instead of 30.

  • 30 meter on each side pond, 2m deep - is 2000 cu m. Energy - MGH = 2M kg *10u*6u = 100MJ. That is 27 kWhr. Hydro is 90% efficient.[3]. Take 50% for our system. That is 12kWhr. could be good. Even if it's 6 kWhr - that is sufficient for an efficient house.

Option C

  • Housetop - 32 totes. 8800 gal. 40 cu m.
  • Rise would be 20', almost 7m.
  • Mgh=40,000*10*7=almost 3 MJ. Or 0.8 kwhr.

Working Doc

https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1FXZjGWcSwAZYxykedo9sqP4YGUlJRRiDUnYzKFTzHnI/edit#slide=id.g5c3be0ce2d_1_28

References

Turbine Sources

Contacts

Contacted Regrarians, Permies, TED Fellows on Facebook.

Hi Permies, I've been bouncing this pumped hydroelectric storage idea, which we are considering for a future workshop. This appears feasible at our site, with 30 feet of head, using two quarter acre ponds. I'm contacting http://www.canyonhydro.com/micro/microfaq.html#FAQ_HowMuchPwr to find out more about Pelton turbines - any ideas on other reputable Pelton turbine sources?

Calling the engineers in the audience - I just ran through some calculations on the feasibility of water pumping storage at Factor e Farm, our facility. The numbers look really good on paper. The drawing shows two quarter acre ponds - the contour lines are at 1 foot elevation intervals, so 30 foot drop between the ponds. The calculation yields 24kWhr of energy storage from this using proven microhydro technology - where the elevated pond serves as a reserve that can be pumped during daylight for gravity water storage. This is an open call for review of the calculations, see below. Explanation: Can we consider a storage hydro system that pumps during the day and generates electricity by night? Quick calculations: 1/4 acre pond, 6 foot deep. That is about 2000 cubic meters of water. Take another pond 10 m lower. The energy of water going from pond 1 to pond 2 (see drawing attached) is MgH = energy = [2000 cu m]x[1000kg/cu m]x[10 m/s^2]x[10 m] = 200 MJ 200 MJ = 200 MW for 1 second, or 200 kW for 1000 seconds, or 2 kW for 100,000 seconds - but assume 50% system efficiency (85% pumping, 85% generating, then 20% friction loss) THAT IS over 24 HOURS OF 1KW OF POWER!!!!!!!!!!!! Cost will be $1.5k in 4" pipe (about 1000 ft), $1k in power equipment, $10k in excavation + trenching for 2 ponds. If we have our own dozer, that will be $3k system cost. $3k for 24kWhr of power storage appears to beat batteries by a factor of 5-10 in cost. Sure looks good on paper. Are these numbers sound? If this works, we will consider this project for a future workshop in permaculture and open source technology, like the ones we're running now (http://bit.ly/1lHE2fw). If anyone can help us develop this project, please let me know.

Other Types of Gravity Storage

Links

  • Alexander Slocum, MIT - ocean windmill storage - [9]

Internal Links

  • Pelton Wheel
  • Flow battery - the cheapest form of chemical storage possible - $1/kwhr for materials, and $10/kwhr for balance of system

External Links