Supply Chain Development: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
That is - making more of the parts in-house, improving performance and improving the revenue model to the point of ending [[Scarcity Economics]]. | That is - making more of the parts in-house, improving performance and improving the revenue model to the point of ending [[Scarcity Economics]]. | ||
Some other ways include | |||
#developing supplier networks among collaborators. | |||
#Developing production machines collaboratively, so that more parts can be made in house. | |||
#Searching existing suppliers for more favorable options: better, faster, cheaper, stronger, more consistent, better customer service, closer, etc. | |||
This all focuses on the framework of [[Flexible Fabrication]], as opposed to highly specialized machines. | |||
Latest revision as of 16:29, 10 June 2020
First and foremost, supply chain development should focus on Recursion.
That is - making more of the parts in-house, improving performance and improving the revenue model to the point of ending Scarcity Economics.
Some other ways include
- developing supplier networks among collaborators.
- Developing production machines collaboratively, so that more parts can be made in house.
- Searching existing suppliers for more favorable options: better, faster, cheaper, stronger, more consistent, better customer service, closer, etc.
This all focuses on the framework of Flexible Fabrication, as opposed to highly specialized machines.