Belt Safety Factor: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "*Conveyor belts - see figure 10 in [http://www.ckit.co.za/secure/conveyor/papers/troughed/improving/improving.htm]. Recommended safety factor is 7x - but about 3x of that is d...") |
No edit summary |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
*Conveyor belts - see figure 10 in [http://www.ckit.co.za/secure/conveyor/papers/troughed/improving/improving.htm]. Recommended safety factor is 7x - but about 3x of that is due to the splice. So spliceless belts can have a lower safety factor. | *Conveyor belts - see figure 10 in [http://www.ckit.co.za/secure/conveyor/papers/troughed/improving/improving.htm]. Recommended safety factor is 7x - but about 3x of that is due to the splice. So spliceless belts can have a lower safety factor. | ||
*For the [[Open Source Shredder]] - stalling should be 100%, and degradation another 100% - so a 4x safety factor should be considered? | |||
**But - the 4x safety factor should not be based on the ultimate tensile strength! But more like 10% of it - [https://www.pooleyinc.com/pdf/0902_WkingStrvsBrkingStr.pdf] |
Latest revision as of 22:17, 17 June 2020
- Conveyor belts - see figure 10 in [1]. Recommended safety factor is 7x - but about 3x of that is due to the splice. So spliceless belts can have a lower safety factor.
- For the Open Source Shredder - stalling should be 100%, and degradation another 100% - so a 4x safety factor should be considered?
- But - the 4x safety factor should not be based on the ultimate tensile strength! But more like 10% of it - [2]