Compressed Air Storage Calculations: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
 
(57 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
=Calculations for a 1kWhr System=
*From [[Compressed Air Energy Storage]] results, it takes 170 cubic meters of air to deliver 1kWhr of usable stored energy.
**This is an inefficient adiabatic system - could be much better if we use isothermal process
=Calculator=
See https://www.tribology-abc.com/abc/thermodynamics.htm
According to the calculator, a 50 l tank of air at 3000 psi will release about 0.5kWhr via adiabatic expansion, and 2.5x this with isothermal expansion. '''Thus: a system where we heat the air for an air engine (heat added to keep it isothermal) - 1.5kWhr is the available energy. A 33% effcient air engine gets us 500Whr.''' This is not bad, worth pursuing. Essentially: 1/2kWhr of storage for a $300 tank cost. This paper shows 70% efficient engines. [https://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijrm/2012/578745/] - implying that we can get 1kWhr power output from a single cylinder of high pressure air.
=Rough Calculations=
*Air tools require 30 cfm for 1 hp [https://fluidpowerjournal.com/air-tool-is-inefficient/#:~:text=Typical%20Compressor%20Performance&text=An%20air%20motor%20producing%20one,shaft%20power%20at%20the%20tool.]
*A 300 cuf tank thus gives 10 minutes, about, of 1 hp power. With radial piston motor - at 10-20 the efficiency, easily gives 1 hp hr. Let's get specifics.
*6 cylinders would thus give 1 hp hr. Not great, but we can get much better efficiencies from a better air engine.
=Air Engine=
*Rotary air engine - [https://newatlas.com/go/3185/?itm_source=newatlas&itm_medium=article-body]
*0,75 hp $200 30 cfm [https://www.ebay.com/itm/Gast-2Am-Ncc-96-Air-Motor-0-75-Hp-30-Cfm-3000-Rpm/224284004034?_trkparms=aid%3D1110006%26algo%3DHOMESPLICE.SIM%26ao%3D1%26asc%3D20201210111314%26meid%3D51badb5ba31a4cfba8919d28689fa4d1%26pid%3D101195%26rk%3D1%26rkt%3D12%26mehot%3Dpf%26sd%3D164136369915%26itm%3D224284004034%26pmt%3D1%26noa%3D0%26pg%3D2047675%26algv%3DSimplAMLv5PairwiseWebWithDarwoV3BBEV2b&_trksid=p2047675.c101195.m1851]
*Rotary vane, 1.8 hp $200 [https://www.amazon.com/4AM-NRV-92-1-80HP-ROTARY-PNEUMATIC-D414496/dp/B00YQ79ZAY/ref=zg_bs_6374816011_8?_encoding=UTF8&psc=1&refRID=33XPE9NQWWJ9M0CCSTX1]
*[[Radial Piston Motor]] - 20x more efficient at full load than rotary! [https://ptm-mechatronics.com/ueberzeugender-effizienztest-beim-groessten-lackhersteller-deutschlands/]
*Radial vs axial piston motors - [https://www.hydraulicspneumatics.com/technologies/other-components/article/21883033/air-motor-selection-and-sizing]
*Data curve - 25 cu ft/min for 0.8 hp at 100 psi [https://pdf.directindustry.com/pdf/globe/piston-air-motors/23399-393311.html]. Thus, 12 minutes on 1 tank of 300 cu ft. Get 5 tanks for 1 hp hr, at cost of $1500. The good part is that the metal tanks will last for ever.
=Cylinder Sourcing=
*'''Firefighter supply - 300 cf $300 [https://www.feldfire.com/Meret-Oxygen-Cylinder-with-540-Valve_p_10731.html]'''
*250 cf - $285 [https://www.questcylinder.com/product/new-250-cf-cylinder-k/]
*250 cf = $330 [https://www.ebay.com/p/943555181?iid=233396320517] K size?
*T-size 300 cf - [https://cpr-savers.com/300-cu-ft-T-Steel-Cyl-w-CGA-540-Std-Valve_p_12688.html?gclid=Cj0KCQiA34OBBhCcARIsAG32uvO8ggttjbMMq2_v_LYggX_QnkCefo5UHJ-7C0-tE2m4BBEY5RO_2PYaAkyqEALw_wcB]
*T goes up to 390 cf - [http://www.lindencylinders.com/cylinders.html]
=Compressor=
*Scuba compressor - $243, 1800W - [https://www.ebay.com/itm/254444644525?_trkparms=ispr%3D1&amdata=enc%3AAQAFAAACMBaobrjLl8XobRIiIML1V4Imu%252Fn%252BzU5L90Z278x5ickk54RcAtDOV1Ncc5XnH5ejj9Clj1NS0M%252B1JjUoKVvwvy3GogDYnyh2Hp%252FNnKbtyuq7ED9%252BdXLH852H7tiq207JYQvkxDckKV2JNWHy70yRS%252FBt4pjoSZ5TeO4Z9nL%252BO9yoYLYvrm%252Fr4c5NcM3TUVkOcEMly%252BhqTkeWt0R71d%252FsgFv4X2f0F23LGlaoMOyJ0PZRS%252FXUMGj6GGkD3rCy39lhUOowuLUJcP0NTSVSgGTGEAXa2RR5idwzW82%252BZ%252FVUi9DQpvcsOSM5RESn5A4EQadQwFPDL0A5KfoiAKjINlp0BC7Ae%252B569k3cK9AJs6VDnvHgFKV9qfOF04DTmHDSF1wxZ0QGwsTX7%252FaGy%252FaBIH82SK4MO3iYJNP3NFcOKi810%252F%252Fwew88Yz85awmt1H7Ny7Tz6VMT8boJm3VgKmR6bOv76wW3gW3sdXkILlOQ%252F9%252BO3%252FL7xUOnD5HYLR5%252F7A2jnyQAUVGEHeBXtQn2IWD2E2dz%252BbizVj2gqmL4i2UH1cy77zunUMBlun1%252Ft9Qv%252BDwKYJn%252Bj4lcdRHi2gB2W8KfgKtRD2nb4DQyUNVhez7q799D9CDYAP%252BqGV2eFNyW8l33Q0SzueneC1IH%252FdUVf48nGk%252F1%252FIgd8BObnEdNt6vzJuMmrTsVKHRTl6UWrAfPpUzDLP6jGmr2P0O6E%252BFyDzS9XR5Uqp2C5q0ZoUqBvAK53AmiPNi8%7Ccksum%3A254444644525f7c425cef8f64822b69c4f145c4906b9%7Campid%3APL_CLK%7Cclp%3A3268220&chn=ps&norover=1&mkevt=1&mkrid=711-117182-37290-0&mkcid=2&itemid=254444644525&targetid=1068323855710&device=c&mktype=pla&googleloc=9023315&poi=&campaignid=10454521601&mkgroupid=104612011660&rlsatarget=pla-1068323855710&abcId=2146002&merchantid=108324990&gclid=Cj0KCQiA34OBBhCcARIsAG32uvNTvvNTHp_2sZHNcRpN3bIxxQuN1_L1W7iFKJ7ChObtahLM7EFGXNgaAqitEALw_wcB]
=Technical=
*Compressed Air Index - [https://ptm-mechatronics.com/en/efficiency-and-high-performance/]
*Energy stored in a cubic meter of volume at 70 bar is 6.3 kWhr. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compressed-air_energy_storage#Isothermal_storage]. Compare to 300 cu ft - which correcponds to 42l volume inside - 0.04 cu meter - but equiv to 0.1 of the above if done at 200 bar - then energy stored in the gas cylinder is 0.6 kWhr. And before, we said we have 12 minutes of 0.75 kW. Yes, figures match assuming around 20% efficiency of air motor.
*One k type cylinder, 50 l volume, gives 5300 kJ or 1.4kWhr of stored energy under isothermal expansion. Thus, Wikipedia [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compressed-air_energy_storage#Specific_energy,_energy_density_and_efficiency] checks with online calculator [https://www.tribology-abc.com/abc/thermodynamics.htm].
=3D Printed=
*Diaphragm air-tight engine seems to work reasonably well [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5B1H5syp4PM&list=PLj3Bh6Krv9CVh21y_YHLYzprBtOMNprvp&index=8]
<html><iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/5B1H5syp4PM" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe></html>
*Tech used: diaphragm and bump valve without spring. Diaphragm acts as spring.
*5x bigger version - [https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:4078618]
=Efficiencies=
*Piston engine - 13% at 5 bar [https://www.google.com/search?sxsrf=ALeKk026QG9BbsZl0rNsBS9KmerMgczY_w%3A1602863734253&source=hp&ei=dsKJX6q8DJDYsAXHkpG4Cw&q=what+is+the+maximum+mechanical+efficiency+of+compressed+air+engines&btnK=Google+Search&oq=how+to+configure+nvidia+geforce+gtx+1650+super+on+linux+mint&gs_lcp=CgZwc3ktYWIQAzIFCCEQoAEyBQghEKsCMgUIIRCrAjoOCAAQ6gIQtAIQmgEQ5QI6DgguELEDEMcBEKMCEJMCOggILhDHARCvAToLCC4QsQMQxwEQowI6CAgAELEDEIMBOggILhCxAxCDAToFCAAQsQM6AggAOgQIABAKOgYIABAWEB46CAghEBYQHRAeOgcIIRAKEKABUMsQWOmzAWD8tAFoBnAAeACAAeQGiAGhS5IBDTExLjQ3LjMuMi42LTGYAQCgAQGqAQdnd3Mtd2l6sAEG&sclient=psy-ab&ved=0ahUKEwiqz4DcvLnsAhUQLKwKHUdJBLcQ4dUDCAk&uact=5]
*50 Whr/l at 300 bar [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compressed_air_car]
*This  with 50 kwHr/cubic meter. Does not match 6.4 kwhr at 70 bar [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compressed-air_energy_storage#Isothermal_storage]? Possibly, though simple multiplication yields 25 kWhr/cu m.
*Harmonic motor 60% efficient? [https://www.techbriefs.com/component/content/article/tb/insiders/md/stories/27436#:~:text=The%20motor%20can%20use%20compressed,air%20motors%20for%20equivalent%20power.]. You can license it form LLN, where you can [[Pay for the Results Twice]].
=Air Drill=
*1 hp - [https://www.flexibleassembly.com/Chicago-Pneumatic-Key-Chuck-Drill-1Hp-CP1117P26]. 30 CFM at 1 hp [https://www.cp.com/en-us/tools/products/drills/cp1117p26]
*0.5 hp - [https://www.flexibleassembly.com/Chicago-Pneumatic-Drill-Key-Chuck-05Hp-CP1014P05]. 19 cfm. [https://www.cp.com/en-us/tools/products/drills/cp1014p05]
=Vane vs Piston=
*Vane motors have shorter life and less efficiency than piston motors - [https://www.google.com/search?sxsrf=ALeKk026QG9BbsZl0rNsBS9KmerMgczY_w%3A1602863734253&source=hp&ei=dsKJX6q8DJDYsAXHkpG4Cw&q=are+piston+motors+more+efficient+than+vane+motors&btnK=Google+Search&oq=how+to+configure+nvidia+geforce+gtx+1650+super+on+linux+mint&gs_lcp=CgZwc3ktYWIQAzIFCCEQoAEyBQghEKsCMgUIIRCrAjoOCAAQ6gIQtAIQmgEQ5QI6DgguELEDEMcBEKMCEJMCOggILhDHARCvAToLCC4QsQMQxwEQowI6CAgAELEDEIMBOggILhCxAxCDAToFCAAQsQM6AggAOgQIABAKOgYIABAWEB46CAghEBYQHRAeOgcIIRAKEKABUMsQWOmzAWD8tAFoBnAAeACAAeQGiAGhS5IBDTExLjQ3LjMuMi42LTGYAQCgAQGqAQdnd3Mtd2l6sAEG&sclient=psy-ab&ved=0ahUKEwiqz4DcvLnsAhUQLKwKHUdJBLcQ4dUDCAk&uact=5]
=Specific Cases of Motor Power=
<html> <iframe src="https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/e/2PACX-1vRS6kFQO1FVvGnE37pAqwf30zho_edc0IibgjvB9ZnN9vY3RsMnRYZEXoeNzV46q5jIsQ67ec5rJkYP/embed?start=false&loop=false&delayms=3000" frameborder="0" width="480" height="389" allowfullscreen="true" mozallowfullscreen="true" webkitallowfullscreen="true"></iframe> </html>
[https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1JNmYJjoIdPdL6iizyyrHRIh8BlG1w7hblZU3yVEeO4A/edit#slide=id.gb328b2d63d_0_9 edit]
=Low Velocity Air Motors=
*Ex [https://coretooltech.com/product/air-motor-100w-0-13-hp-stall-torque-2-0nm-1850-rpm-r-l-3-8-24-spindle-0-8-lbs/] - any rpm, any power from low to high
*100W example - 10 cfm on page 4. [https://www.dobcoeqp.com/info/products/Web%20Catalogs/Bosch/BoschAirMotors%20CAN-%202006.pdf]
*This is hugely inefficient, as 30 CFM gets you 1 hp, or 3.5 cfm for 100W from piston motors.
*But,
=About Standard Vane Motors=
*See [https://www.atlascopco.com/content/dam/atlas-copco/industrial-technique/general/documents/pocketguides/9067%2001%20Pocket%20Guide%20to%20Air%20motors.pdf]
*2000 hour life of lubricated, 1000 for unlubed motors
*Note piston motors last longer.
*Hard to find efficiency of vane motor
*Turbines are 75% efficient. [https://www.hydraulicspneumatics.com/technologies/other-components/article/21883033/air-motor-selection-and-sizing#:~:text=Efficiency%20of%20an%20air%20motor,65%25%20to%2075%25%20efficiency.]
=Turbines=
*75-95% motorbike turbine efficiency - [https://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijrm/2012/578745/] ? No, paper seems bogus. The high percentage is the closeness to which reality matches theory, but the actual efficiency is unstated. This is describing a vane type motor, with likelu 30% efficiencies.
*Smaller turbines in industry can be geared down - [https://power.mhi.com/products/steamturbines/lineup/industrial/deceleration]
*See [[3D Printed Rotary Tool]]


=Links=
=Links=
*[[Compressed Air Energy Storage]]
*[[Compressed Air Energy Storage]]
*[[Low Tech Magazine on Compressed Air Storage]]
*[[Low Tech Magazine on Compressed Air Storage]]
*[[Gas Cylinders]].
*[[Radial Piston Motor]]

Latest revision as of 15:34, 28 February 2021

Calculations for a 1kWhr System

  • From Compressed Air Energy Storage results, it takes 170 cubic meters of air to deliver 1kWhr of usable stored energy.
    • This is an inefficient adiabatic system - could be much better if we use isothermal process

Calculator

See https://www.tribology-abc.com/abc/thermodynamics.htm

According to the calculator, a 50 l tank of air at 3000 psi will release about 0.5kWhr via adiabatic expansion, and 2.5x this with isothermal expansion. Thus: a system where we heat the air for an air engine (heat added to keep it isothermal) - 1.5kWhr is the available energy. A 33% effcient air engine gets us 500Whr. This is not bad, worth pursuing. Essentially: 1/2kWhr of storage for a $300 tank cost. This paper shows 70% efficient engines. [1] - implying that we can get 1kWhr power output from a single cylinder of high pressure air.

Rough Calculations

  • Air tools require 30 cfm for 1 hp [2]
  • A 300 cuf tank thus gives 10 minutes, about, of 1 hp power. With radial piston motor - at 10-20 the efficiency, easily gives 1 hp hr. Let's get specifics.
  • 6 cylinders would thus give 1 hp hr. Not great, but we can get much better efficiencies from a better air engine.

Air Engine

  • Rotary air engine - [3]
  • 0,75 hp $200 30 cfm [4]
  • Rotary vane, 1.8 hp $200 [5]
  • Radial Piston Motor - 20x more efficient at full load than rotary! [6]
  • Radial vs axial piston motors - [7]
  • Data curve - 25 cu ft/min for 0.8 hp at 100 psi [8]. Thus, 12 minutes on 1 tank of 300 cu ft. Get 5 tanks for 1 hp hr, at cost of $1500. The good part is that the metal tanks will last for ever.

Cylinder Sourcing

  • Firefighter supply - 300 cf $300 [9]
  • 250 cf - $285 [10]
  • 250 cf = $330 [11] K size?
  • T-size 300 cf - [12]
  • T goes up to 390 cf - [13]

Compressor

  • Scuba compressor - $243, 1800W - [14]

Technical

  • Compressed Air Index - [15]
  • Energy stored in a cubic meter of volume at 70 bar is 6.3 kWhr. [16]. Compare to 300 cu ft - which correcponds to 42l volume inside - 0.04 cu meter - but equiv to 0.1 of the above if done at 200 bar - then energy stored in the gas cylinder is 0.6 kWhr. And before, we said we have 12 minutes of 0.75 kW. Yes, figures match assuming around 20% efficiency of air motor.
  • One k type cylinder, 50 l volume, gives 5300 kJ or 1.4kWhr of stored energy under isothermal expansion. Thus, Wikipedia [17] checks with online calculator [18].

3D Printed

  • Diaphragm air-tight engine seems to work reasonably well [19]

  • Tech used: diaphragm and bump valve without spring. Diaphragm acts as spring.
  • 5x bigger version - [20]

Efficiencies

  • Piston engine - 13% at 5 bar [21]
  • 50 Whr/l at 300 bar [22]
  • This with 50 kwHr/cubic meter. Does not match 6.4 kwhr at 70 bar [23]? Possibly, though simple multiplication yields 25 kWhr/cu m.
  • Harmonic motor 60% efficient? [24]. You can license it form LLN, where you can Pay for the Results Twice.

Air Drill

Vane vs Piston

  • Vane motors have shorter life and less efficiency than piston motors - [29]

Specific Cases of Motor Power

edit

Low Velocity Air Motors

  • Ex [30] - any rpm, any power from low to high
  • 100W example - 10 cfm on page 4. [31]
  • This is hugely inefficient, as 30 CFM gets you 1 hp, or 3.5 cfm for 100W from piston motors.
  • But,

About Standard Vane Motors

  • See [32]
  • 2000 hour life of lubricated, 1000 for unlubed motors
  • Note piston motors last longer.
  • Hard to find efficiency of vane motor
  • Turbines are 75% efficient. [33]

Turbines

  • 75-95% motorbike turbine efficiency - [34] ? No, paper seems bogus. The high percentage is the closeness to which reality matches theory, but the actual efficiency is unstated. This is describing a vane type motor, with likelu 30% efficiencies.
  • Smaller turbines in industry can be geared down - [35]
  • See 3D Printed Rotary Tool

Links