Agency-Based Pay Concept: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
See also [[Learning Compression Factor]] | See also [[Learning Compression Factor]] | ||
Source [https://chatgpt.com/share/696c17dd-00ec-8010-97e0-c351f32c89f9] - long discussion about how prices are set in the [[Future Builders Academy Enterprise Track]] | |||
=Final Synthesis= | |||
In an agency-first abundance system, value accrues only through direct participation. Surplus is not redistributed; it collapses into lower costs and expanded opportunity. Pay reflects current scarcity, not personal merit, and declines as systems mature. Individuals who wish to earn more must act by entering higher-leverage work made accessible through fast learning and open systems. Exit is always available, adaptation is always encouraged, and dignity is preserved through choice rather than entitlement. | |||
== The agency-first resolution == | == The agency-first resolution == | ||
Latest revision as of 03:38, 18 January 2026
See also Learning Compression Factor
Source [1] - long discussion about how prices are set in the Future Builders Academy Enterprise Track
Final Synthesis
In an agency-first abundance system, value accrues only through direct participation. Surplus is not redistributed; it collapses into lower costs and expanded opportunity. Pay reflects current scarcity, not personal merit, and declines as systems mature. Individuals who wish to earn more must act by entering higher-leverage work made accessible through fast learning and open systems. Exit is always available, adaptation is always encouraged, and dignity is preserved through choice rather than entitlement.
The agency-first resolution
In the agency-based model:
- Pay is never shared
- Surplus is never pooled
- Prices remain fixed per cycle
- Baselines evolve predictably
- Opportunity migrates upward
- Only actors capture value