Perry's Intellectual and Moral Development: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "https://www.upgradable.org/flourishing-presentation People progress from seeing knowledge as absolute and authority-based → to recognizing multiplicity and uncertainty → to making responsible commitments in a relativistic world. https://chatgpt.com/share/69954675-5168-8010-9aab-b01a56b2d5be") |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
https://chatgpt.com/share/69954675-5168-8010-9aab-b01a56b2d5be | https://chatgpt.com/share/69954675-5168-8010-9aab-b01a56b2d5be | ||
4 main areas (9 in detail): | |||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
! Stage | |||
! Ethical Stance | |||
! Core Moral Logic | |||
! Primary Risk | |||
|- | |||
| Dualism | |||
| Authority-based moral absolutism | |||
| Right and wrong are defined by legitimate authority; moral correctness = obedience | |||
| Dogmatism; outsourcing moral responsibility to authority | |||
|- | |||
| Multiplicity | |||
| Subjective moral relativism | |||
| Multiple moral views exist; when uncertain, all opinions are treated as equally valid | |||
| Moral flattening; tolerance without moral courage in the face of harm | |||
|- | |||
| Relativism | |||
| Contextual, evidence-based ethics | |||
| Moral claims are evaluated by reasons, evidence, and systemic impacts; some positions are better justified than others | |||
| Analysis paralysis; ethical debate without action | |||
|- | |||
| Commitment within Relativism | |||
| Chosen ethical commitments under uncertainty | |||
| One commits to values and acts responsibly while remaining open to revision based on better understanding | |||
| Burnout; re-hardening into ideology if reflexivity is lost | |||
|} | |||
Latest revision as of 05:12, 18 February 2026
https://www.upgradable.org/flourishing-presentation
People progress from seeing knowledge as absolute and authority-based → to recognizing multiplicity and uncertainty → to making responsible commitments in a relativistic world.
https://chatgpt.com/share/69954675-5168-8010-9aab-b01a56b2d5be
4 main areas (9 in detail):
| Stage | Ethical Stance | Core Moral Logic | Primary Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dualism | Authority-based moral absolutism | Right and wrong are defined by legitimate authority; moral correctness = obedience | Dogmatism; outsourcing moral responsibility to authority |
| Multiplicity | Subjective moral relativism | Multiple moral views exist; when uncertain, all opinions are treated as equally valid | Moral flattening; tolerance without moral courage in the face of harm |
| Relativism | Contextual, evidence-based ethics | Moral claims are evaluated by reasons, evidence, and systemic impacts; some positions are better justified than others | Analysis paralysis; ethical debate without action |
| Commitment within Relativism | Chosen ethical commitments under uncertainty | One commits to values and acts responsibly while remaining open to revision based on better understanding | Burnout; re-hardening into ideology if reflexivity is lost |