Perry's Intellectual and Moral Development: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "https://www.upgradable.org/flourishing-presentation People progress from seeing knowledge as absolute and authority-based → to recognizing multiplicity and uncertainty → to making responsible commitments in a relativistic world. https://chatgpt.com/share/69954675-5168-8010-9aab-b01a56b2d5be")
 
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:


https://chatgpt.com/share/69954675-5168-8010-9aab-b01a56b2d5be
https://chatgpt.com/share/69954675-5168-8010-9aab-b01a56b2d5be
4 main areas (9 in detail):
{| class="wikitable"
! Stage
! Ethical Stance
! Core Moral Logic
! Primary Risk
|-
| Dualism
| Authority-based moral absolutism
| Right and wrong are defined by legitimate authority; moral correctness = obedience
| Dogmatism; outsourcing moral responsibility to authority
|-
| Multiplicity
| Subjective moral relativism
| Multiple moral views exist; when uncertain, all opinions are treated as equally valid
| Moral flattening; tolerance without moral courage in the face of harm
|-
| Relativism
| Contextual, evidence-based ethics
| Moral claims are evaluated by reasons, evidence, and systemic impacts; some positions are better justified than others
| Analysis paralysis; ethical debate without action
|-
| Commitment within Relativism
| Chosen ethical commitments under uncertainty
| One commits to values and acts responsibly while remaining open to revision based on better understanding
| Burnout; re-hardening into ideology if reflexivity is lost
|}

Latest revision as of 05:12, 18 February 2026

https://www.upgradable.org/flourishing-presentation

People progress from seeing knowledge as absolute and authority-based → to recognizing multiplicity and uncertainty → to making responsible commitments in a relativistic world.

https://chatgpt.com/share/69954675-5168-8010-9aab-b01a56b2d5be

4 main areas (9 in detail):

Stage Ethical Stance Core Moral Logic Primary Risk
Dualism Authority-based moral absolutism Right and wrong are defined by legitimate authority; moral correctness = obedience Dogmatism; outsourcing moral responsibility to authority
Multiplicity Subjective moral relativism Multiple moral views exist; when uncertain, all opinions are treated as equally valid Moral flattening; tolerance without moral courage in the face of harm
Relativism Contextual, evidence-based ethics Moral claims are evaluated by reasons, evidence, and systemic impacts; some positions are better justified than others Analysis paralysis; ethical debate without action
Commitment within Relativism Chosen ethical commitments under uncertainty One commits to values and acts responsibly while remaining open to revision based on better understanding Burnout; re-hardening into ideology if reflexivity is lost