XM Strategic Third Party Review: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=Introduction= | |||
This is perhaps the most important step in the procedure - the involvement of leading 3rd party advisors, mentors, and [[SME]]s for additional insight to extend the quality and scope of the effort. | This is perhaps the most important step in the procedure - the involvement of leading 3rd party advisors, mentors, and [[SME]]s for additional insight to extend the quality and scope of the effort. | ||
| Line 6: | Line 7: | ||
#Conversion of an autistic process into a global peer review process | #Conversion of an autistic process into a global peer review process | ||
#Since review can happen on any aspect of the process (social, technical, organizational, philosophical, economic, etc.) - this step has the most potential for providing mid-course correction and resources to the OSE effort | #Since review can happen on any aspect of the process (social, technical, organizational, philosophical, economic, etc.) - this step has the most potential for providing mid-course correction and resources to the OSE effort | ||
=Points of Review= | |||
This step should include explicit external review of any and all development steps, and in particular: | |||
*Design | |||
*Fabrication procedure | |||
*Performance analysis | |||
*CAE review | |||
[[Category:XM]] | [[Category:XM]] | ||
Latest revision as of 03:48, 22 April 2012
Introduction
This is perhaps the most important step in the procedure - the involvement of leading 3rd party advisors, mentors, and SMEs for additional insight to extend the quality and scope of the effort.
The strategic aspect refers to:
- Inviting world leaders to get involved
- Normalizing external review and collaboration as a core component of OSE strategy
- Conversion of an autistic process into a global peer review process
- Since review can happen on any aspect of the process (social, technical, organizational, philosophical, economic, etc.) - this step has the most potential for providing mid-course correction and resources to the OSE effort
Points of Review
This step should include explicit external review of any and all development steps, and in particular:
- Design
- Fabrication procedure
- Performance analysis
- CAE review