XM Current Challenge: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
The Current Challenge is updated daily - and it should describe the working issues that are being solved, in order to allow others to chip in effort and accelerate velocity. The Current Challenge should provide an assessment of the issues being developed - with planning up to 1 month in advance. The current challenge should be a paragraph or two describing the existing work (on product or component level) with numerous hyperlinks to Work Product, Industry Standards Analysis, or any other steps of the Master List of Steps - in order to ground the discussion. The Current Challenge should inform the Strategic Planning process, the next step in the Master List of Steps.
The Current Challenge is updated daily - and it should describe the working issues that are being solved, in order to allow others to chip in effort and accelerate velocity. The Current Challenge should:
*provide an assessment of the issues being developed - with planning up to 1 month in advance
*be a paragraph or two describing the existing work (on product or component level)
**use numerous hyperlinks to Work Product, Industry Standards Analysis, or any other steps of the Master List of Steps - in order to ground the discussion
*inform the Strategic Planning process, one of the next steps in the Master List of Steps
*provide insight into the procedure and work required in order to help assess the time needed for completion
**If the time estimates are provided for every part of the process, an accurate assessment of velocity may be obtained for a meaningful burndown graph


[[Category:XM]]
[[Category:XM]]

Latest revision as of 03:35, 1 April 2012

The Current Challenge is updated daily - and it should describe the working issues that are being solved, in order to allow others to chip in effort and accelerate velocity. The Current Challenge should:

  • provide an assessment of the issues being developed - with planning up to 1 month in advance
  • be a paragraph or two describing the existing work (on product or component level)
    • use numerous hyperlinks to Work Product, Industry Standards Analysis, or any other steps of the Master List of Steps - in order to ground the discussion
  • inform the Strategic Planning process, one of the next steps in the Master List of Steps
  • provide insight into the procedure and work required in order to help assess the time needed for completion
    • If the time estimates are provided for every part of the process, an accurate assessment of velocity may be obtained for a meaningful burndown graph