XM Current Challenge: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
**use numerous hyperlinks to Work Product, Industry Standards Analysis, or any other steps of the Master List of Steps - in order to ground the discussion | **use numerous hyperlinks to Work Product, Industry Standards Analysis, or any other steps of the Master List of Steps - in order to ground the discussion | ||
*inform the Strategic Planning process, one of the next steps in the Master List of Steps | *inform the Strategic Planning process, one of the next steps in the Master List of Steps | ||
* | *provide insight into the procedure and work required in order to help assess the time needed for completion | ||
**If the time estimates are provided for every part of the process, an accurate assessment of velocity may be obtained for a meaningful burndown graph | |||
[[Category:XM]] | [[Category:XM]] | ||
Latest revision as of 03:35, 1 April 2012
The Current Challenge is updated daily - and it should describe the working issues that are being solved, in order to allow others to chip in effort and accelerate velocity. The Current Challenge should:
- provide an assessment of the issues being developed - with planning up to 1 month in advance
- be a paragraph or two describing the existing work (on product or component level)
- use numerous hyperlinks to Work Product, Industry Standards Analysis, or any other steps of the Master List of Steps - in order to ground the discussion
- inform the Strategic Planning process, one of the next steps in the Master List of Steps
- provide insight into the procedure and work required in order to help assess the time needed for completion
- If the time estimates are provided for every part of the process, an accurate assessment of velocity may be obtained for a meaningful burndown graph