Power Cube VI: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
See [[Power Cube 6]] for fuller treatment.
#Redirect [[Power Cube 6]]  


Version 6 will include several updates:
Version 6 will include several updates:
Line 30: Line 30:
[[Category:Power Cube]]
[[Category:Power Cube]]
[[Category:Tom Griffing]]
[[Category:Tom Griffing]]
=Details=
I just completed version 5 (just delivered to Marcin) and am about to begin on version 6.
Version 6 will include several updates:
*28 HP engine
*Larger 7 gallon fuel tank (Prototype IV had a 1 gallon tank)
*Symmetric fuel/hydraulic tanks
*Simplified engine mounting and access to pump & coupling
*Thermostatically controlled oil cooling fan
*Rubber vibration mounts for engine
*Commercial muffler
*Control / hydraulic panel
[[Image:pc6.jpg]]
Here are my best answers to your questions - using Power Cube 6:
*Weight: Approx 150 lbs dry.  Hydraulic oil and fuel can add up to 100 lbs (14 gallons @ 7.3 lbs/gallon).
*Dimensions: 27" x 27" x 27" cube
*CG: If you mean "Center of Gravity", no data on this yet, but it will vary with fluid distribution in the tanks
*Duration: No data yet, as we are using a new engine.  This also depends on power usage.
*Fuel: 7 Gallons
Notes:
*The power is delivered via hydraulic fluid power through the quick coupler connectors. 
*The Power cube attaches to the LifeTrac with the quick attach plates - which are at 45 degrees.
*I would like to add remote controls to the Power Cube via electronic interface, but haven't started on this yet.  This will be very important for remote throttle, start & stop.
*I have discussed with Marcin the possibility of working on a "MicroTrac" walk-behind two wheel tractor that would be like a LARGE, powerful tiller.  I envision it to employ the Power Cube for power.  It could be just a drive train from a car.
*I have also discussed with Marcin the possibility of splitting the Power Cube into two the engine and drive components, where the engine could be detached from the hydraulic pump via a quick connect shaft coupling.  The engine could then be connected to something else (like a car?) for direct drive power.  This one is still in the concept phase, but seems reasonable.  The key component would be the shaft coupling.  Its components would have to be re-arranged, as the engine component could not rely on the presence of the hydraulic tank for support.

Latest revision as of 22:24, 17 January 2014

Redirect to:

Version 6 will include several updates:

  • 28 HP engine
  • Larger 7 gallon fuel tank
  • Symmetric fuel/hydraulic tanks
  • Simplified engine mounting and access to pump & coupling
  • Thermostatically controlled oil cooling fan
  • Rubber vibration mounts for engine
  • Commercial muffler
  • Control / hydraulic panel

Pc6.jpg

Here are my best answers to your questions - using Power Cube 6:

  • Weight: Approx 150 lbs dry. Hydraulic oil and fuel can add up to 100 lbs (14 gallons @ 7.3 lbs/gallon).
  • Dimensions: 27" x 27" x 27" cube
  • CG: If you mean "Center of Gravity", no data on this yet, but it will vary with fluid distribution in the tanks
  • Duration: No data yet, as we are using a new engine. This also depends on power usage.
  • Fuel: 7 Gallons

Notes:

  • The power is delivered via hydraulic fluid power through the quick coupler connectors.
  • The Power cube attaches to the LifeTrac with the quick attach plates - which are at 45 degrees.
  • I would like to add remote controls to the Power Cube via electronic interface, but haven't started on this yet. This will be very important for remote throttle, start & stop.
  • I have discussed with Marcin the possibility of working on a "MicroTrac" walk-behind two wheel tractor that would be like a LARGE, powerful tiller. I envision it to employ the Power Cube for power. It could be just a drive train from a car.
  • I have also discussed with Marcin the possibility of splitting the Power Cube into two the engine and drive components, where the engine could be detached from the hydraulic pump via a quick connect shaft coupling. The engine could then be connected to something else (like a car?) for direct drive power. This one is still in the concept phase, but seems reasonable. The key component would be the shaft coupling. Its components would have to be re-arranged, as the engine component could not rely on the presence of the hydraulic tank for support.