Review: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=If you have suggestions, use our Review Form= | =If you have suggestions, use our Review Form= | ||
==This applies to technical review of machines, or organizational and process review.== | |||
<html><iframe src="https://docs.google.com/a/opensourceecology.org/forms/d/1J9n1T3kXr9w1_hOkjvsfJwtLST5AWIm1A3R_aKAsHBM/viewform?embedded=true" width="760" height="500" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading...</iframe></html> | <html><iframe src="https://docs.google.com/a/opensourceecology.org/forms/d/1J9n1T3kXr9w1_hOkjvsfJwtLST5AWIm1A3R_aKAsHBM/viewform?embedded=true" width="760" height="500" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading...</iframe></html> | ||
Revision as of 02:05, 4 April 2015
If you have suggestions, use our Review Form
This applies to technical review of machines, or organizational and process review.
Introduction
Review is desired within an open organization - on anything that can lead to organizational learning. The goals are:
- Providing general feedback
- Providing mid-course corrections as necessary
- Identifying key missing resources that prevent goals from being met
- Assessing proper allocation of resources and shifting resources around if necessary
Key Elements of a Review Submission
- Clear presentation of results - allow review to happen rapidly. Brevity and clarity are key, without which it is impossible to go through all of a person's materials.
- Verifiable - results are easily verifiable, increasing the likelihood that
Organizational Review
Key questions:]
- Clarity - What is the mission of the company and what is its unique approach? How is that approach implemented? For OSE, it's the Developing an ethical, open source economy.
- Strategy - does the core work of the company adhere to its core mission?
- Coherence - is every piece of the company aligned with the core mission? What could be better?
- Resource allocation - are people matched to their skill set?
- Projects - are the projects priorities chosen in a way that helps the company grow, while considering constraints and opportinities?
- Learning - what mechanisms are built in so that the company is a learning organization?
Technical Review
You can use this form to submit technical review. If you want others to submit technical review, use various communication channels to solicit a response.
Implementation
Currently, OSE uses the following review process:
Organizational/Technical
- Core contributors maintain a daily Work Log showing all results and progress.
- Staff maintains a Project Review framework consisting of a Critical Path Diagram and a spreadsheet of all supporting tasks
- Core staff writes a monthly planning and review in their work log - 1. summary of accomplishments, 2. What worked. 3. What didn't. 4. Plan for next month.
- Staff meet with ED once a month for the Project Review