Depth of Modularity: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Depth of modularity is the level at which a modular breakdown occurs, in order to promote [[Technological Time Binding]].
Depth of modularity is the level at which a modular breakdown occurs, in order to promote [[Technological Time Binding]].  


The insight here is that modularity has to occur at the correct level of granularity: it may occur anywhere from the smallest piece of a machine - to the machine as a whole, and anywhere in between.
The insight here is that modularity has to occur at the correct level of granularity: it may occur anywhere from the smallest piece of a machine - to the machine as a whole, and anywhere in between.
Line 6: Line 6:


The appropriate Depth of Modularity must thus be considered based on functional characteristics, and not only on the requirement of that includes frame disassembly.
The appropriate Depth of Modularity must thus be considered based on functional characteristics, and not only on the requirement of that includes frame disassembly.
The significance of the Depth of Modularity is its implication for Technological Time Binding. Technological Time Binding further implies a transformation in humanity's relationship to technology, in that technology becomes appropriate when non-experts are increasingly able to manage its use.

Revision as of 02:37, 30 January 2016

Depth of modularity is the level at which a modular breakdown occurs, in order to promote Technological Time Binding.

The insight here is that modularity has to occur at the correct level of granularity: it may occur anywhere from the smallest piece of a machine - to the machine as a whole, and anywhere in between.

For example, if the Power Cube always works as a monolithic unit, there is no compelling reason to x-y-z bolt the corners so the power cube can be disassembled - though this is useful from the standpoint of radical modularity. One has to strike a balance. In the Power Cube example - it turns out that other modules are not as easy to attach to a Power Cube due to the xyz bolted frame, which introduces serious spatial bolt-together conflicts. Thus, a welded frame - still using the same perforated tubing - works much better in terms of attachability of other modules to the Power Cube. As long as all other components outside the frame can be disassembled, the welded power cube frame can be ok. Thus, from a functional level - a lower level of modularity (no xyz bolted corners, but instead a monolithic frame) - is much better for attaching other modules to the Power Cube.

The appropriate Depth of Modularity must thus be considered based on functional characteristics, and not only on the requirement of that includes frame disassembly.

The significance of the Depth of Modularity is its implication for Technological Time Binding. Technological Time Binding further implies a transformation in humanity's relationship to technology, in that technology becomes appropriate when non-experts are increasingly able to manage its use.