Mark Log: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
= Sunday, October 16, 2016. 2:41pm =
<html>
<iframe src="https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1NkFT_ewn5N2Oz6wQIE3Rd5jb_UCrLvkKUGojGp1YrAA/embed?start=false&loop=false&delayms=3000" frameborder="0" width="960" height="569" allowfullscreen="true" mozallowfullscreen="true" webkitallowfullscreen="true"></iframe>
</html>
[https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1NkFT_ewn5N2Oz6wQIE3Rd5jb_UCrLvkKUGojGp1YrAA/edit#slide=id.g18516073f2_0_2 edit]
=Fri Oct 14, 2016=
=Fri Oct 14, 2016=
MJ notes - let's get the temperature difference up to 100C with glycol or sugar water.
MJ notes - let's get the temperature difference up to 100C with glycol or sugar water.

Revision as of 19:43, 16 October 2016

Sunday, October 16, 2016. 2:41pm

edit


Fri Oct 14, 2016

MJ notes - let's get the temperature difference up to 100C with glycol or sugar water.

Thursday, October 13, 2016. 1:30am.

Been out of town. Did basic Google and YouTube searches for existing implementations of TEG systems, DIY-ers, and TEG knowledge. Reviewed existing material from wiki on TEG. Reviewed Marcin's log of feedback from ITS board outreach. Learned how to create wiki account and create a work log. Plan to have basic first drafts of designs up tomorrow (later today). "...TEG's fill factor is ~50%, meaning cover 50% surface area of the hot tube... And because only 1/2 of the 60C drop is applied on TEG..." Follow up on these comments from Zhixi... Sounds like we need a different design or 5x bigger system to achieve 100W?