Collaborator Evaluation: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "To assess the capacity of collaborators, the Development Team encourages that everyone fill out the Team Culturing survey as a baseline. We are open to suggestions and re...") |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{delete|content moved to Web Collaboration Strategy}} | |||
To assess the capacity of collaborators, the [[Development Team]] encourages that everyone fill out the [[Team Culturing]] survey as a baseline. We are open to suggestions and refining of this process. For example, there should be a transparent way to rate contributors: | To assess the capacity of collaborators, the [[Development Team]] encourages that everyone fill out the [[Team Culturing]] survey as a baseline. We are open to suggestions and refining of this process. For example, there should be a transparent way to rate contributors: | ||
Line 7: | Line 9: | ||
#Prototypes built | #Prototypes built | ||
And at | And at deeper levels: | ||
#Communities started | #Communities started | ||
#Acreage of land placed into stewardship | #Acreage of land placed into stewardship | ||
#Enterprises started with GVCS tools | #Enterprises started with GVCS tools |
Latest revision as of 06:05, 30 April 2011
This page was tagged as a candidate for deletion. If this page does not meet our criteria for deletion, please remove this notice.
(Explanation: content moved to Web Collaboration Strategy)
To assess the capacity of collaborators, the Development Team encourages that everyone fill out the Team Culturing survey as a baseline. We are open to suggestions and refining of this process. For example, there should be a transparent way to rate contributors:
- Duration involved in the project
- Technical and other contributions to the project
- Funding or other resources raised
- CAD design contributed
- Prototypes built
And at deeper levels:
- Communities started
- Acreage of land placed into stewardship
- Enterprises started with GVCS tools