Candidate Assessment: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "=STEAM Camp Senior Project Manager= *Note job description is similar to an Event Planner.")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
=STEAM Camp Senior Project Manager=
=STEAM Camp Senior Project Manager=
*Note job description is similar to an [[Event Planner]].
Assessment:
==Learning and Esteem==
*Are they not afraid to ask questions?  Qualitative.
*Are they quick to determine what is already available in documentation vs not?
==Openness==
*Do they work openly? Ie, log, hours
*Do they ask questions before assuming things?
==Humility and Arrogance==
*Are they combative in their assertions? This would not work for me.
*Do they learn effectively?
*Do they think that the more they know, the more they know that they don't know?
*Do they believe that they cannot do it alone? That EVERYTHING can be better when we do it together?
==Collaboration==
*Do they respect my time?
*Do they share source for work product?
*Do they share source for process?
*Do they use open tools? Docs, FreeCAD, OBS, Kdenlive, FreeCAD, Inkscape
=Proactive=
*Do they start their own indexes to clarify structure?
*Do they find out things on their own, or do I need to spoon feed them?
=Networking=
*Are they resourceful in coming up with venues for recruiting instructors?
=Complexity Management=
*Do they edit the wiki to create their own indexes?


*Note job description is similar to an [[Event Planner]].
*Do they have high self-esteem and confidence?
*Do they take direction well?
*Can they give direction?
*Can they teach me things?
*Are they inspiring to work with?
*Do they grasp the open source economy?
*Do they get many things done better than I could?
*Do they have a good work ethic?
*Can they manage complexity?
*Are they relational?
*Can they notice certain documentation needs - such as basic collaboration How To videos - to on-board people faster?

Revision as of 21:08, 28 October 2019

STEAM Camp Senior Project Manager

Assessment:

Learning and Esteem

  • Are they not afraid to ask questions? Qualitative.
  • Are they quick to determine what is already available in documentation vs not?

Openness

  • Do they work openly? Ie, log, hours
  • Do they ask questions before assuming things?

Humility and Arrogance

  • Are they combative in their assertions? This would not work for me.
  • Do they learn effectively?
  • Do they think that the more they know, the more they know that they don't know?
  • Do they believe that they cannot do it alone? That EVERYTHING can be better when we do it together?

Collaboration

  • Do they respect my time?
  • Do they share source for work product?
  • Do they share source for process?
  • Do they use open tools? Docs, FreeCAD, OBS, Kdenlive, FreeCAD, Inkscape

Proactive

  • Do they start their own indexes to clarify structure?
  • Do they find out things on their own, or do I need to spoon feed them?

Networking

  • Are they resourceful in coming up with venues for recruiting instructors?

Complexity Management

  • Do they edit the wiki to create their own indexes?
  • Do they have high self-esteem and confidence?
  • Do they take direction well?
  • Can they give direction?
  • Can they teach me things?
  • Are they inspiring to work with?
  • Do they grasp the open source economy?
  • Do they get many things done better than I could?
  • Do they have a good work ethic?
  • Can they manage complexity?
  • Are they relational?
  • Can they notice certain documentation needs - such as basic collaboration How To videos - to on-board people faster?